I was going to do a blogpost about this myself, but PariahPottyMouth said it so well. Click on the title link below for the full article:
Archive for September, 2014
My Favorite Manosphere Post This Week 9.25.14
Posted: September 25, 2014 in Favorite Post, Feminism, Life, Men, Men's Rights, WomenTags: anger, feminism, HeforShe
Ruined
Posted: September 20, 2014 in Life, Sluts, Teenagers, WomenTags: first love, Justin Bieber, ruined for life, Selena Gomez
I wanted to present someone who is a very good and contemporary picture of why “good” men have such a hard time later in life keeping a wife. I wanted to show everyone that we are watching the Red Pill principle of Hypergamy-is-the-Female-Imperative play out in real time. Ladies and GentleDudes, I present to you…….Selena Gomez. She is the perfect modern example of someone that will never be able to be a faithful and loyal wife. She is currently 22 years old, smack dab in the middle of her prime, cute as a button, and could command the attention and commitment of almost any man that she wanted. So what is she doing? She’s giving her best to her on-again, off-again, Bad Boy boyfriend. The Bieber. She was supposedly, supposedly a virgin when they first got together, and she wore a purity ring…but of course that flew off of her finger the nanosecond she connected with Bieber.
And of course it would, because she is literally living every little girl’s dream: she has a career, money, and
fame in both acting and music, but the cherry on top is that she is dating the hottest teen idol on the planet. The coolest of the cool kids. The one boy that every female under the age of 25 would die to be with, and she’s got him. At least sometimes.
She most likely gave him her virginity, he’s an out of control bad boy who can’t stay out of trouble more than 24 hours, he’s famous, popular on a global scale, and most likely cheating on her. In other words, he has every single tingle inducing quality that a woman would ever want. If this man is indeed her first love, we can predict Selena’s future; it’s going to be precisely the same as Shirley Jones’:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/24/shirley-jones_0_n_3647862.html
“If Jack hadn’t fully come to terms with my sexual boundaries before, after that night in Las Vegas with Jean, he now understood conclusively that threesomes were just not my thing. From then on, I assumed that he went his own way, sexually speaking, and, I guess, had threesomes with other women instead. I was still madly in love with him, and my awareness of his many infidelities, in whatever permutations he chose, didn’t tarnish my love for him. Nor did our threesome with Jean.”
Jones admits that she knowingly turned a blind eye to his many indiscretions.
“Off camera, in the real world, the Swinging Seventies were in full bloom, and Jack was determined to explore every aspect of the new sexual freedom. He wanted it all: swinging, pornography, drugs, group sex. I carried on just looking away and ignoring his infidelities.“
“He was never able to be alone, so now he wanted me to take him back. I didn’t have to think too long about my answer. We had three children together, he was their father, and despite everything I still loved him. The psychiatrist I was then seeing told me that I was making a big mistake by taking him back: “You are never going to change that man. Don’t go back into this marriage thinking you can.” He was right, of course, but the Shirley Jones who had fallen so deeply in love with Jack Cassidy so many years ago wasn’t prepared to relinquish her dream man. And I didn’t.“This isn’t the first time Jones has opened up about her relationship with Cassidy, who died in a fire in 1976. She told newspapers in 1983 that if he were alive, she doubted that she would have ever married her second husband Marty Ingels, to whom she is still married.“He wanted to come back (to me) right up to the day he died,” she said. “And as I realized later, I wanted him. That’s the terrible part. Much as I love Marty and have a wonderful relationship –- I’d say this with Marty sitting here –- I’m not sure if Jack were alive I’d be married to Marty.“

Mother-Daughter Lesbian Couple
Posted: September 19, 2014 in Life, WomenTags: acceptance, lesbian, Mother daughter
I’m not sure this is real. It’s starting to look like it’s not. But if this is real, this is what we’ve come to. A mother having a sexual relationship with her own daughter, looking for acceptance for their lifestyle.
http://www.thoughtsofajeanius.com/?p=22035
Here’s her Twitter, and listen to some of this stuff:
Vertasha and I fell in love by accident. It was never planned or even seen that way. I perform oral,we hold hands & kiss thats all.
Lets be clear i am disgusted by those dming about how to seduce their children. This is not about that. You are going to hell.
my daddy and I have a similar relationship! We support you! @VertashaAndMary
The Gay Pass
Posted: September 18, 2014 in Gay, Life, Men, Men's Rights, TeenagersTags: Fatties, Fatty, Gay, Hall Pass, Non-monogamous, polygamy
Why do gay people get a pass? I demand equal rights for straight men. Let’s let Ana & Cenk tell the story first:Let’s examine some of these arguments verbatim:
At the top of the clip, Ana says: “For some people it’s easy to recognize what their sexuality is early on in life, but for others they don’t realize it until after they’re married.” ….So what if a man discovers that he’s polygynist in orientation and would much rather prefer a polygamist lifestyle? It’s acceptable for him to blow up his monogamous marriage to pursue his true self then, I must say.
At 0:30 we hear from Lauren Morelli, the writer at the center of the story. Let’s take her words and apply them to a man in a monogamous situation. “I realized I didn’t want to live a monogamous lifestyle in fall 2012, one of my first days on the set. It wasn’t so much one thing, but the sum of many details: how uncomfortable I’d feel around all of those hot actresses or how I considered myself a ‘not very sexual person.’ When considered alone, these seemed like little quirks that made me me. Wanting to have threesomes or more instead of having sex with just your wife is a perfectly reasonable preference to have, right? I was finally forced to consider a question that had never, ever occurred to me before: Holy sh*t, am I non-monogamous?”
At 2:17 Ana says the following: “I think the scariest thing is, I think that she probably thought, or had suspicions about her sexuality, right? But maybe she was afraid of it, maybe she didn’t want to address it or confront it, and imagine how scary that is to be in a relationship that you know you’re not happy in but you feel kinda trapped.” Let’s apply that to a man that has a 400 pound wife, and doesn’t have sex with her anymore because he gets nauseated just looking at her; the man realizes that he’s only attracted to thinner women. Or again, a man that realizes, after his nuptials, that the monogamous lifestyle is not for him. If he feels trapped, he most certainly shouldn’t have to stay, clearly.
At 2:53 Cenk says that “I think that she started writing for a show about lesbians in order to work out what she was feeling inside, and couldn’t quite put it into words until she put in the words of her character.” So….let’s say a straight male writer starts writing about a guy in high school, who’s surrounded by barely legal girls…he realizes that, even though he’s 40 and married to a 40 year old woman, he can’t seem to keep his mind off of 18 & 19 year old females. He discovers that he wants to only be with girls right out of high school through his cathartic writing.
Then Cenk makes this statement at 3:18: “To me the most amazing part of the story, putting all our goofy kidding aside, is that, how much societal pressure could shut down a person’s natural instincts, right? I mean, she was obviously attracted to women all along, but because of all the expectations and pressure, she so assumed that she must’ve been straight that she didn’t even consider being gay as an option, even though she had already made out with women….isn’t that amazing???” So, a straight non-monogamous guy, even though he’s juggled plates before, after he gets married, because of all the societal pressure and expectation was just assuming that manning up and getting married was who he was, and he didn’t even consider being polygamous as an option, even though he had already had multiple women before….isn’t that amazing???
And, at 4:01, Ana puts the cherry on top of the sundae: “And a lot of people are upset with her, because they feel like she broke up her marriage, and she didn’t work hard enough, and once you take your vows it’s supposed to be as serious as possible which I, look, when you get married, you should take your vows seriously, I’m not trying to belittle that, right, but at the same time, what did you want her to do? Remain married to a man she wasn’t in love with, and who she had absolutely no interest in having sex with?” A straight man who’s repulsed by his wife, does he get that same understanding/freedom? If she’s 400 lbs or just if he’s done with monogamy and ready to move on….he has those some options, correct?
There’s more gems in there, but I want to restate: I demand equal rights for straight men who realize after they’re married they do not want fatties, they only like 19 year olds, or they are just simply non-monogamous. In the video they said repeatedly, “This is different! She’s attracted to a whole other gender!” It’s different, really?
My Favorite Manosphere Post This Week 9.16.14
Posted: September 16, 2014 in Favorite Post, Feminism, Hypergamy, Life, Men, WomenTags: Exposed, hypergamy, Sandman, Women Against Feminism
Not a blog this time for my favorite, but a video. Manospherians are quite familiar with The Sandman. I know this was released at the end of August, but I still wanted to feature it now, because it’s so powerful. Also because #WomenAgainstFeminism is still a thing. This video really speaks for itself: Also check it out on Sandman’s MGTOW site here. I really vibe with this sentiment, as I personally tend to have a long memory. I really hope that men never forget that women’s hypergamous strategy has been laid bare by Feminism, and you will never get her best.
So why should you give her yours?
LOSER CALL OUT
Posted: September 14, 2014 in Call OutTags: Copyright Infringement, Loser, Plagiarism, Stolen work
WELP. Found another place of plagiarism & copyright infringement.
This dude, Demoniclizard ===>
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=159734031
STOLE MY ENTIRE POST. CLICK ON THE LINK ABOVE AND SEE IF YOU RECOGNIZE THAT. #Loser
I wrote that piece, here.
So I’m trying to figure out why it is that a man today should propose.
And my basic question is this: who stands to gain the most from a marriage?
A woman will gain his last name, total control over their children, a default assumption of innocence in any marital disputes, control over his health and end of life decisions, half of his income in the present, half of it for the future, alimony, child support, access to his pension, and because she gets the children, she gets the house. She can also jail him at any time with accusations of marital rape, or abuse, or exposing pornography to the children, or whatever the heck she wants. Guaranteed and enforced by law. She can even get pregnant by another man, openly cuckolding him, and still force her husband to pay.
So why does HE have to ask HER?
What does he gain? Absolutely no guarantee of virginity, chastity, fidelity, respect, domestic skill, half of HER income, nothing. What’s hers is hers, and what’s his is hers. A woman has absolutely no legal or social requirement to bring any wifely qualities to the table, nor behave like a wife once she legally becomes one.
A man asking a woman to give him her hand in marriage, is asking for the honor of being put in the worst position he could possibly be in. A position with no rights, all of those belong to her, he just has responsibilities. He is also tying himself to one vagina, and the owner of that vagina will use it to control him, as she does not need sex as much as he does. When she needs verbal release, she can go elsewhere. When she needs attention and compliments, she can go elsewhere. When she needs finances, she can go elsewhere.
When he needs sex, he JUST HAS HER. People will say, what about masturbation or porn, but you don’t need a wife for those things. You need a wife for live, real time, in person love making. Which will of course be at her discretion, not his, even though she gets her benefits daily and guaranteed.
So I’ll ask one more time……why, exactly, should a man propose to a woman?
SHE should be proposing to HIM.
Solipsism on Steroids AKA the Blame and Projection Parade
Posted: September 11, 2014 in Hypergamy, Men, Solipsism, WomenTags: hypergamy, solipsism, Wall
If you ever wanted a glimpse into the thinking of today’s woman, a glimpse into what single men have to choose from, a glimpse into what turned PUAs and MRAs into what they are, I present to you Lauren Martin, and her article from the Feminist Scriptures:
Why Women Need To Start Asking Men Out…Because Men Have No Balls
http://elitedaily.com/dating/men-pssies-women-need-start-asking-men-dates/746965/
There are just too many buckets of solipsistic gold in that article to miss, but I want to highlight a few of my favorite warpings of reality from this woman.
In her introduction she describes her disappointment in today’s men, and paints a picture of unyielding bleakness for any girl hoping to live her dream:
Ladies, it’s been said before, but I’ll say it again: They just don’t make ‘em like they used to.
There’s no door-holding, no hand-holding and definitely no free drinks. There’s no taking off hats or courting through invitations. There are no smooth moves, no jackets to dinner. There are no flowers, no tables by candlelight. But, most importantly, there are no dates.
After too many nights spent in bars and one too many phone numbers given out, you’ve probably realized the sad truth of the situation. You’re not going on any dates or being courted in any type of manner because, unfortunately, men these days are cowards.
Funny how she completely displays her lack of understanding of the male psyche. No true man is a coward. It does not, and obviously will not, occur to her that today’s woman is no prize. There’s nothing there to be won. Men aren’t afraid to pursue….it’s that the end goal simply isn’t worth any pursuit. Not beyond a pump and dump. She continues on in her solipsistic brilliance to prove why.
Well — to be fair here — not all men, but a lot of them.
We’re dealing with a new breed of men here and it’s not the kind we grew up dreaming about. It’s the want-what-I-want-but-don’t-know-how-to-get-it type; it’s the sweet and cuddly mama’s boys who grow up terrified of making the first move; it’s the guys who have so much to say but don’t know how to say it.
Not really, no. It’s the men who grew up under Title IX, men who’ve watched other men get Divorced Raped over and over again, men watching the False Rape Accusation circus, feeling the ball crushing truths of being forced to take the Red Pill, the Death of the Nice Guy, men observing the brain crunching illogical fallacy named ‘The Slutwalk‘ and men who have been cruelly exposed to the true nature of women. These men do indeed know how to say what they mean….and what they mean is, “no thanks.”
Now, the unfortunate paradox for a woman is that she must be the chased and the chaser. She must be the target and the shooter. She must play coy and simultaneously pursue him.
Anyone notice the problem here? Yet again, women are left to do all the work. We’re left playing both sides of the game because they’ve simply forgotten how to play.
It stems from a number of factors, but most prominently from the fact that men don’t know what the hell they want from us. They want the virgin and the whore. The want the slut and the good girl. They want the girl who’s hard to get, but they don’t know how to get her.
Because they don’t know what they want, they end up chasing nothing. It’s the dilemma of the overcrowded buffet. There are too many options so they choose an empty plate… or something they don’t even like to begin with.
This leaves women making all the moves. We must tell them what they want if we’re to get anywhere close to the goals we had for ourselves. But it will never be as we fully imagined because, in our dreams, men weren’t timid or scared little boys; in our dreams, men are the ones with the balls to ask us out.
Oh, poor women. They have to be the burden bearers, the risk takers, the decisions makers, the Lions and the Lambs, because us silly men are just scared little boys. Except we aren’t. To quote Judgy Bitch:
Of the 2977 people killed on September 11th, 2001, 414 were NYC emergency personnel who responded to the attack. 341 firefighters, 60 police officers, 8 EMTs and 3 court officers.
Two of those responders were women. The other 412 were men.
Full article here.
The unflappable Ms. Martin then goes on to tell us exactly what is to blame for the current sorry state of men.
They’re scared of you
They’ll never admit it, but you scare the hell out of them. After years of social conditioning, we’ve been duped into thinking that men are the strong ones; that they are the leaders, the protectors and the fighters; that they are the ones that see what they want and go after it.
Well, TV lied to you. Men aren’t these masculine displays of strength and perseverance.
Men are shy, timid and scared sh*tless of any woman with half a brain.
That’s pretty much what it takes to believe that, half a brain. Men have more fear? Incorrect. Women have less value. But she continues.
They got it from their mamas
Why are men like this? Well, for years they’ve been raised by their mamas, the women who told them they were the best thing God created on this earth. For years, they’ve been given everything on a silver platter — up until the end of college when they were picking up women who just threw up their jungle juice.
Can’t you just smell the cauldron of irony? This coming from a culture that has spent countless ergs of energy championing and supporting single motherhood in spite of the fact that there is overwhelming evidence that children of single mothers do worse in life. But there’s more.
They think there’s always someone better
In the society in which we live today, with Gigi Hadid and Miranda Kerr’s Instagrams readily accessible, women have got a lot to compete with. Fortunately, we’re competing with women these men will never have a shot with. Unfortunately, these men don’t seem to know this.
This is just pure textbook projection. Checkout Exhibit A.
They never grew up
In a sad, but not all that surprising, report by Nickelodeon UK, men are 11 years behind women in maturity. While women reach maturation by 32, men aren’t fully matured until 43. While this study garnered much attention, women everywhere were less than surprised. Didn’t we already know this?
Men never grow up, hmmm? I’ll just let these gifs right here deal with that. And her conclusion is that the current low rates of marriage are again, the sole fault of males:
To add insult to the few dates you have yet to be asked on, men are also getting married less than ever before. According to a study by Pew Research Center, only 26 percent of Generation-Y is married.
Compared to the 48 percent of our parents at this age, there’s no denying that men just don’t have their sh*t together.
Right, right, because it’s clearly men that are delaying marriage these days. Oh wait.
But the pièce de résistance of this whole piece? The fact that Ms. Martin has failed at everything she’s touched:
My Favorite Manosphere Post This Week: 9.10.14
Posted: September 10, 2014 in Favorite Post, Hypergamy, Men, Sluts, Solipsism, WomenTags: Christianity, SEX, sluts, whore
Has to be this one(Dalrock did a post on it, and I commented extensively there, but I thought I’d add my two cents in a post of my own), where losing virginity outside of marriage is now a new way to experience God’s love:
http://www.thefrisky.com/2014-09-09/girl-talk-what-losing-my-virginity-taught-me-about-faith/
What is just astounding in that entire post is the language, and the Female Hamster in Turbo Overdrive. There should no longer be any doubt among Manospherians that females have the ability to rationalize anything, ANYTHING, and justify their behavior by their emotions. And have no qualms in twisting, warping, or downright ignoring clear scripture to do so. There is no upper limit to the Hypergamy Hamster.
BUT WHAT JUMPS OUT MOST AT ME WAS WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU REVERSE THE GENDER OF THE AUTHOR.
Let’s look at some passages that she wrote, verbatim, altering them only to seem as if a man had written them:
When I started dating my then-girlfriend, a lapsed Catholic, I hadn’t been to church in over a year, though I still made an effort to pray and study the Bible. My new job was at a church ministry where I disagreed with the leadership’s theology. Proponents of the purity movement would say that I was falling away from the faith and that’s why I started fooling around with women. I no longer had a deep connection with Christ that I was supposed to have, which made me vulnerable to the manipulations of The World.
But this wasn’t my case at all, and the flattening of such a narrative does a disservice to the complexity of faith. Losing my virginity wasn’t the end result of falling away from my faith – it was the beginning of a renewal, of learning to love God and my neighbors more deeply and fully than ever before.
HAH. Can you see a guy justifying his promiscuity in this way and still punching his Christian Card? There’s more:
This also isn’t a conversion story of how losing my virginity made me realize how far away I’d fallen and now I’m chastened, back on the straight-and-narrow and celibate. I’m not celibate and I’m dating around. And I’m a Christian whose faith, at this point, is probably stronger than at any point in my younger years. And I know that this faith, this commitment, wouldn’t have been possible had I not actively made the decision to give up on purity.
Purity, for me and for many men, became a distraction from the Gospel. In evangelicalism, purity is so closely tied to a salvation message that loss of purity is necessarily painted as a loss of faith – and this leaves many men wondering what happens if they do make the decision to have sex, even if it’s in the “right” circumstances. Learning to have sex without shame often creates a crisis of faith because we’re told for years and years that sex is shameful, scary and not something men should want.
HAHAHAH! Keeping it in mah pants was a distraction from the Gospel, so gettin’ my rocks off and forgetting about that whole ‘no fornication’ thing sure did increase mah faith! But here’s the cherry(HUGE punnage intended) on top of it all:
For me, making the decision to have sex without shame, to own that part of myself and to make those decisions, has only improved my faith and my understanding of God’s love. Sex liberated me from my puritanical judgment and strict ideas about what’s right and wrong. It taught me to meet people where they are – just as Jesus did – and in that way, it became a different kind of sacrament. I judge people less now. I don’t wrap my faith up in whether or not I’m performing the rules in the right way. And I understand God’s love for God’s people on a deeper, more personal level than ever before.
Losing my virginity outside of a marriage relationship taught me how to be a better person and a better Christian. It challenged my presuppositions about what sexual health looks like, and brought into stark relief the gaps in my education about ethics and holiness. Sex, in this way, can be a sacrament, a movement toward understanding God, a form of holiness experienced in a deep, mystical way. Sex can be holy, whether or not you have a ring on your finger.
I don’t understand. Why can’t men make this same argument?
http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2009/07/former_word_of_life_youth_mini.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/20/jack-schaap-sentenced-ind_n_2918139.html
http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/HowHaggardWasFiredAndWhy.html
http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/i-watched-art-school-steal-my-friends-virginity
http://restoringsexualpurity.org/the-sexually-addicted-minister/
I’ll ask it again…..why isn’t this a beautiful, deeply spiritual, Gospel-enhancing experience if men do it? If Jesus made love to Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary Salome, Martha(Lazarus’ brother) and all the other women that followed Him, He’s still just as much the Savior, right?