Ruined

Posted: September 20, 2014 in Life, Sluts, Teenagers, Women
Tags: , , ,

I wanted to present someone who is a very good and contemporary picture of why “good” men have such a hard time later in life keeping a wife. I wanted to show everyone that we are watching the Red Pill principle of Hypergamy-is-the-Female-Imperative play out in real time. Ladies and GentleDudes, I present to you…….Selena Gomez. Selena Gomez_YoungUnShe is the perfect modern example of someone that will never be able to be a faithful and loyal wife. She is currently 22 years old, smack dab in the middle of her prime, cute as a button, and could command the attention and commitment of almost any man that she wanted. So what is she doing? She’s giving her best to her on-again, off-again, Bad Boy boyfriend. The Bieber. She was supposedly, supposedly a virgin when they first got together, and she wore a purity ring…but of course that flew off of her finger the nanosecond she connected with Bieber.

Selena-Gomez-Purity-RingAnd of course it would, because she is literally living every little girl’s dream: she has a career, money, andSELENA VISITS JUSTIN ON SET! Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez embrace and kiss as she visits him on the set of his new music video 'Boyfriend' fame in both acting and music, but the cherry on top is that she is dating the hottest teen idol on the planet. The coolest of the cool kids. The one boy that every female under the age of 25 would die to be with, and she’s got him. At least sometimes.

She most likely gave him her virginity, he’s an out of control bad boy who can’t stay out of trouble more than 24 hours, he’s famous, popular on a global scale, and most likely cheating on her. In other words, he has every single tingle inducing quality that a woman would ever want. If this man is indeed her first love, we can predict Selena’s future; it’s going to be precisely the same as Shirley Jones’:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/24/shirley-jones_0_n_3647862.html

“If Jack hadn’t fully come to terms with my sexual boundaries before, after that night in Las Vegas with Jean, he now understood conclusively that threesomes were just not my thing. From then on, I assumed that he went his own way, sexually speaking, and, I guess, had threesomes with other women instead. I was still madly in love with him, and my awareness of his many infidelities, in whatever permutations he chose, didn’t tarnish my love for him. Nor did our threesome with Jean.”

Jones admits that she knowingly turned a blind eye to his many indiscretions.

“Off camera, in the real world, the Swinging Seventies were in full bloom, and Jack was determined to explore every aspect of the new sexual freedom. He wanted it all: swinging, pornography, drugs, group sex. I carried on just looking away and ignoring his infidelities.ABC's "Katie" - Season One

 “He was never able to be alone, so now he wanted me to take him back. I didn’t have to think too long about my answer. We had three children together, he was their father, and despite everything I still loved him. The psychiatrist I was then seeing told me that I was making a big mistake by taking him back: “You are never going to change that man. Don’t go back into this marriage thinking you can.” He was right, of course, but the Shirley Jones who had fallen so deeply in love with Jack Cassidy so many years ago wasn’t prepared to relinquish her dream man. And I didn’t.
This isn’t the first time Jones has opened up about her relationship with Cassidy, who died in a fire in 1976. She told newspapers in 1983 that if he were alive, she doubted that she would have ever married her second husband Marty Ingels, to whom she is still married.
“He wanted to come back (to me) right up to the day he died,” she said. “And as I realized later, I wanted him. That’s the terrible part. Much as I love Marty and have a wonderful relationship –- I’d say this with Marty sitting here –- I’m not sure if Jack were alive I’d be married to Marty.
Did ya catch all of that boys n’ girls? TEXTBOOK. Shirley Jones is 80 years old, and has never gotten over her philandering, abusive, bipolar, drug addicted first love. She even had the nerve to say in front of her current husband, that she’s only with him because her Bad Boy isn’t alive.
This is Selena Gomez’s future. Selena is ruined.
Thoroughly ruined in every single sense of the word. If she doesn’t marry Beaver, it’s over for her already. She’ll never bond, love, be faithful to, or sex up her subsequent rebound boyfriends the way she has given herself unreservedly to BieberBoy. And whoever she has kids by, if it’s not him, she will just be using that man for his resources to raise the kids, just like Lisa Whelchel did to her husband. Contemplating DivorceAnd she’ll find a reason that she’s not haaaaaapy and she’ll be gone on the first thing moving.
I’m hoping that men that have yet to fully ingest the Red Pill are paying attention. If you’ve been wondering why that pretty girl who did nothing but ignore you in high school and college is now attempting to reconnect with you on FaceBook, and seems to be pushing really hard for a relationship, it’s the surest possible sign that you are a Blue Pill Beta Provider. She does not love you, nor is she sexually attracted to you. She’s only with you because she couldn’t get the Bad Boy love of her life to commit to her. So she’s bringing you his babies to raise.
Women only have one shot to love the way we want them to…and that’s a girl’s first love. Left to her own devices, she will always spend that precious collateral on the worst man possible. It’s the reason that virgin brides have the lowest rate of divorce; they’ve actually saved themselves to bond with their husbands. If not, there will always be three of you in the relationship….the wife, the settled for husband, and the ghost of Alpha past.
Learn from Shirley Jones. And don’t fall in love with or marry a Selena.selena-gomez-purity-ring-2012
Advertisements
Comments
  1. Ras Al Ghul says:

    A person’s first love is the strongest, the impact on men is not as extreme as it is on women, but every love after the first is a little smaller each time

    • Feminine But Not Feminist says:

      Agreed with the post that Selena (and any other woman) has ruined herself as a future/prospective *good* wife (as well as ruining her own satisfaction with said future marriage, assuming it’s not with Bieber) if she has slept with Bieber (or whoever in other women’s cases) but doesn’t marry him.

      @ Ras Al Ghul

      It depends on whether or not a woman actually has sex with her first love or not. If she does, then you are correct. If she doesn’t have sex with her first love, but does with her next one (for example, if she marries her next love but didn’t marry her first, and was waiting until marriage to have sex), then she will bond far more with her next. So a more accurate way of putting it would be to replace the word “love” with “sex partner”, though ideally the two should be one in the same.

      • infowarrior1 says:

        @Feminine but not feminist

        Now you can understand why there is this command in the mosaic law:

        Exodus 22:16-17
        “If a man seduces a virgin who is not engaged, and lies with her, he must pay a dowry for her to be his wife. 17″If her father absolutely refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the dowry for virgins.…

      • Feminine But Not Feminist says:

        @ infowarrior

        Of course. I’m not sure what you’re getting at though, considering I already knew that.

      • infowarrior1 says:

        Only that single having her virginity taken has such an impact that this law was implemented by God himself to ensure that Cad’s dry up and that the woman does not become damaged Goods.

      • Feminine But Not Feminist says:

        Ok, gotcha. Though I already knew that instinctively (which is largely why I was -and am still- determined to keep my own virginity until marriage). My most recent post went into it a little bit.

  2. deti says:

    “[Gomez is t]horoughly ruined in every single sense of the word. If she doesn’t marry [Bieber, her current boyfriend], it’s over for her already. She’ll never bond, love, be faithful to, or sex up her subsequent rebound boyfriends the way she has given herself unreservedly to BieberBoy. And whoever she has kids by, if it’s not him, she will just be using that man for his resources to raise the kids”

    Just copying here the money quote, the one every man needs to understand and apply to his own life. Who’s going to follow Justin Bieber as boyfriend/husband? Who’s willing to take that on? Who’s willing to carry and then unpack and sort through all that baggage?

    And it will be like this even if she hasn’t had sex with Bieber. Anyone she dates or marries after this has to be more famous, wealthier, more “alpha” than Bieber, just to stay “alive” in the relationship.

    Another case in point: Monica Lewinsky. Completely, totally ruined. And she has been. She’s had a few failed relationships after Clinton, and has never been married or had children. Her presidential affair ruined her life. Her last name will forever be synonymous with highly placed political fellatio, with the debate over whether oral sex really is sex. She will forever be That Girl Who Blew Clinton, and the whole world knows it. Who will take Ms. Presidential Kneepads home to meet his parents? Who’s willing to follow THE apex alpha of apex alphas?

    • And it will be like this even if she hasn’t had sex with Bieber. Anyone she dates or marries after this has to be more famous, wealthier, more “alpha” than Bieber, just to stay “alive” in the relationship.

      Exactly. EXACTLY.

      Another case in point: Monica Lewinsky. Completely, totally ruined. And she has been. She’s had a few failed relationships after Clinton, and has never been married or had children. Her presidential affair ruined her life. Her last name will forever be synonymous with highly placed political fellatio, with the debate over whether oral sex really is sex. She will forever be That Girl Who Blew Clinton, and the whole world knows it. Who will take Ms. Presidential Kneepads home to meet his parents? Who’s willing to follow THE apex alpha of apex alphas?

      SPOT ON. Co-sign every word.

      • deti says:

        RPSMF:

        Monica Lewinsky’s life is a tragedy, it really is. I almost feel badly for her. Here’s a reasonably attractive young woman who, had she never had sex with Clinton, would probably have been married off to some doctor or lawyer or business exec somewhere out in LA or NY. She’d be a housewife with a couple of kids, or working her own job if she wanted to. The most controversy she’d ever see is who would be president of the PTA or selecting the color for the napkins for the ladies’ auxiliary banquet.

        Instead, her name is a punchline and will be until the day she dies and then for the next 100 years after. It’s awful to say it, but she’ll likely go to her grave a never-married woman. No man of any MMV whatsoever would ever seriously consider putting a ring on it with her, investing a couple of decades of backbreaking work and a couple of million dollars in hard earned money. Uh, would you be willing to buy “that woman, Ms. Lewinsky” a house with all the accoutrements therefor, and a couple of cars? Didn’t think so. Even now, any man who dates her will expect and demand that she put out immediately with porn-star level sex (and BJs, oh yes, BJs).

        Tragic. And I say that in all seriousness. This is a woman who was on track to be a UMC suburban housewife and mother, not pimping handbags and earning advanced degrees just to make a buck and survive.

      • Random Angeleno says:

        what chance does any man have with the mouth that took a president’s dick?

        may not be a good thing for me, but even i have some compassion for her, she was probably a decent marriage candidate back home without that ton of bricks she’s dragging around for the rest of her life.

      • We’re pretty much in agreement that a degree of sympathy is apropos. We realize better than she does what she’s done
        to her life.
        I know I certainly wouldn’t want to date her, touch her, be in a picture with her, nor bring her home to my family. Yeeesh.

  3. Instead, her name is a punchline and will be until the day she dies and then for the next 100 years after. It’s awful to say it, but she’ll likely go to her grave a never-married woman. No man of any MMV whatsoever would ever seriously consider putting a ring on it with her, investing a couple of decades of backbreaking work and a couple of million dollars in hard earned money. Uh, would you be willing to buy “that woman, Ms. Lewinsky” a house with all the accoutrements therefor, and a couple of cars? Didn’t think so. Even now, any man who dates her will expect and demand that she put out immediately with porn-star level sex (and BJs, oh yes, BJs).

    All of those thoughts you’re posting, I’ve had them for years. SPOT ON.
    I have felt the exact same way for a long time, a sense of true sympathy for her. I know that she didn’t sign up to be a punchline for all of time, and to know that even if she has children, they will never know any peace because of her choices.
    Every day of the life of a Lewinsky child will be spent listening to people say, “You know who your mom is, right? You know what your mom did, right?”

    And that’s also true about any male expectations of her when dating….she’s the “girl who blew the President.” So no guy would be interested in her without that, and, ironically, her claim to fame, as you said, is the very reason she will NEVER get married.

    It really is a shame. But for some reason, women don’t seem to want to understand, there are consequences in life to your choices.

    • deti says:

      According to Lewinsky’s Wikipedia page , she was born in July 1973. So she is just past 41 years old. Kids are all but out of the question for her.

      If ever there was a woman with some SMV and a NEGATIVE MMV, Lewinsky fits the bill. Her MMV is literally less than zero.

    • deti says:

      Another thing with Lewinsky is that because of her durable notoriety, she can’t even get a full time job. According to her Wikipedia page, she hasn’t held full time remunerative employment since 1997 — that’s 14 years, folks.

      This is a woman with a college degree and a master’s in psychology from the London School of Economics. Because of a few highly placed BJs, a woman with no slouchy academic credentials can’t get a job. The reason’s obvious — because no respectable employer wants to be known as That Place Where the Presidential Blow Job Girl Works.

      • deti says:

        Sorry. 17 years.

        This poor tragic figure, this hero of modern feminism, this icon of SIW -ness, cannot even support herself financially.

        Even with two post-secondary advanced college degrees, this pathetic woman’s chief skill, the one thing she appears to be good at, is getting men to have sex with her.

      • You know Deti…..the thing about it is, if any male were to expressly state that women make their way through life by their sexuality, at least with men, it would get the Misogyny Chorus wailing in full blast, in fifteen part harmony.

        But it’s true. Not that all women are whores, but that her sexuality is her bargaining chip when it comes to securing what she wants from men.

  4. Plantronics says:

    I wrote on Donal Graeme’s blog a while back, that men aren’t as stupid socially as people say we are. For example in church, many Uriah’s are realizing that the Bathsheba they have their eye on is actually looking at David not Uriah, so they don’t even try to court Bathsheba. This feeds into the “where are all the men” phenomenon. No one knowingly goes down the path of Uriah. These women don’t even need to have sex with David, yet David ruins them for everyone else anyways.

  5. donalgraeme says:

    Great post and comments. Not sure how I missed it before. I will update my links post to link to this.

  6. […]  First off, “foreplay” is probably not acceptable Christian behavior based on what she is hinting at. The way I look at it, if you aren’t comfortable explaining in graphic detail everything involved to all your friends and family… God probably doesn’t approve (at least, until marriage). This approach is a surefire way to come to sin, and in fact the mindset hints at a sinful attitude already (finding ways to “cheat the system”). Second, delaying children is not a wise plan. It really isn’t. Mrs. ktc explains why you should Have Children. Also, she has responded to my post Proposing A Question with her own post, Proposals. This brings me to the topic of marriage proposals on bended knee. I have yet to hear a good reason why men should do them. Mere expectations or custom at this point are not enough. This alone is reason enough for a man not to do it. But even more than that, bending the knee is a sign of supplication and (as those familiar with Game of Thrones will recognize) surrender. For all the talk about how essential it is for a man to start off strong by proposing to a woman, this runs entirely counter to that. Who the woman in question is doesn’t matter- as a custom it just has no merit. I invite my readers who disagree to explain otherwise, of course. But at this point proposing on bent knee is not something I’m ever going to do. And I will tell any woman I court as much. If she cannot accept that, then in my view it demonstrates she wasn’t a good candidate to begin with. Be Feminine Not Feminist tells women: Don’t rob your children of their Daddy. At Peaceful Single Girl this post demonstrates the damage caused to children by divorce. Apparently Sigyn is having some real trouble with depression and could use your prayers. Stingray explains yet another reason to homeschool. At the same time, homeschooling isn’t easy, as Elspeth will tell you. Much of the problem is that we aren’t aligned as a community towards supporting homsechooling and mothers who stay at the household. The old support networks are gone, and were an essential part of the process. Elspeth also discusses the difference between being unmarried and being single. I describe myself as unmarried, not single, and my reasons match up with those expressed at her blog. Eviscerating the faith through decrying “Paulinity.” I’ve seen some of that applied here in the ‘sphere before. Mostly by men who want to engage in fornication. But I’ve seen a few women argue it as well, often to escape any requirements or duties placed upon them (especially in marriage). I’ve argued before about the risk associated with women with tattoos, and here is yet more support for my concern. Update: Red Pill Set Me Free talks about how a woman, any woman, however high-value, can become Ruined. […]

  7. Blue says:

    “Did ya catch all of that boys n’ girls?”

    Yeah, he “died in a fire.” :/

  8. […] RedPillPushers, as he’s known on his blog, highlighted a typical manospherian point: […]

  9. oldfashionedfellow says:

    Plantronics,

    “For example in church, many Uriah’s are realizing that the Bathsheba they have their eye on is actually looking at David not Uriah, so they don’t even try to court Bathsheba. This feeds into the “where are all the men” phenomenon. No one knowingly goes down the path of Uriah.”

    Apparently you’re not alone.

    See, a letter from a girl not raised in a tight Christian home to Boundless…..

    “I’m 22 years of age and have never been pursued by any gentleman in the church. I know I shouldn’t worry or have doubts about this, but I do. It seems to me like all of the gentlemen at my church are pursuing young ladies:

    who come from homeschooling families
    whose parents are professing Christians
    whose parents bring their families to church and oversee their daughters’ instruction
    whose families are quite large with many children
    who are well-skilled in homemaking and theology because they’ve been blessed with a family who saw to their learning from childhood, and
    whose fathers will sit a gentleman down and discuss his intent with his daughter.

    My parents don’t attend church. Growing up, we never had family devotions and hardly ever talked about theology. My parents couldn’t care less who I date (if I ever did enter into a courtship). They would never sit a guy down and give him their blessing on our relationship and make sure he has sound theology.

    I go to church by myself every week. It’s a wonderful church, and I love all of the people there. But I get discouraged and envious at times. It seems to me like I’ll continue to be looked over — looked over by all of the young men for someone better. Because I have non-Christian parents, didn’t grow up in a Christian home and go to church by myself, no one will ever see me as a suitable prospect.”

    http://www.boundless.org/advice/2014/are-men-not-interested-in-me-because-of-my-family

    Candice responds with a latter from a beta churchian chump…..

    “Today is the day of my wedding. And I am not marrying the girl of my dreams.

    If you would have told me when I was a teenager that my wife would have seven tattoos, a history in drugs, alcohol, and attending heavy metal concerts, I would have laughed at you, given you one of my courtship books, and told you to take a hike. My plans were much different, much more nuanced with careful planning, much more clean-cut, and much more, well, about me.

    You see, it wasn’t my dream to marry a girl that was complicated. I never dreamed that I would sit on a couch with my future wife in pre-marital counseling listening to her cry and tell stories of drunken nights, listing the drugs she used, confessing mistakes made in past relationships.

    This isn’t my dream — it’s better.

    Many people wouldn’t put Taylor and I together. In high school, we probably would not have been friends. She probably would have thought that I was a nice, boring, judgmental Christian kid; I probably would have thought that she was a nice, lost, party-scene girl that guys like me are supposed to stay away from. People like us, with our backgrounds and histories are not supposed to meet, fall in love, and covenant their lives to each other.

    But everything changes when people meet Jesus.”

    http://unspokenblog.wordpress.com/2014/04/26/my-wife-has-tattoos-marriage-new-birth-and-the-gospel/

    Breathtaking.

    • ryant282 says:

      Ugh. So sad how far too many young American men are having to lower themselves to the gutter just to find a mate. I think the worst part of the blog is the tons and tons of effusive, kiss-ass comments from well-wishers, with virutally nobody chiming in and saying, “Um, seriously, dude?”

  10. jack says:

    The actual Uriah knew what was up. He didn’t camp out at the palace out of loyalty. He did it so that David would not be able to cuckold him privately.

    Uriah was a good man, and he tooled David big time. And David paid, and paid, and paid for his sins. Bathsheba was probably to awestruck with her new Kingyboy husband (Uriah who???)

    Uriah knew he was cooked. I’ll bet he went back to the front full well knowing that David was going to do him.

    King David, from Giant-slayer to poon-slayer. From hero to Craven Coward.

  11. cptnemo2013 says:

    Reblogged this on MGTOW 2.0.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s