Archive for the ‘Men’ Category

I was going to do a blogpost about this myself, but PariahPottyMouth said it so well. Click on the title link below for the full article:

13 Sexist Things About HeforShe; Everything Sexist About Emma Watson’s UN Speech

UN Women's "HeForShe" VIP After Party

1. The name of the campaign, HeforShe.

2. Feminism insults men for years and then asks for their help.

3. She WANTS to USE men and boys for feminism.

4. OK with man-hating, not OK with people saying feminism is about man hating

5. Using personal stories just shows more gender bias.

6. No empathy or understanding on how feminism hurts others

7. Men’s Right’s are not human rights

8. She is an elitist, not an oppressed woman.

9. Granting men a “formal invitation” to serve the feminist party

10. Men are oppressed because women are not granted their human rights

11. Feminists define masculinity and perpetuate stereotypes

12. The LGBT Community does not exist.

13. Men and boys are not human.

Why do gay people get a pass? I demand equal rights for straight men. Let’s let Ana & Cenk tell the story first:Let’s examine some of these arguments verbatim:

Five WivesAt the top of the clip, Ana says: “For some people it’s easy to recognize what their sexuality is early on in life, but for others they don’t realize it until after they’re married.” ….So what if a man discovers that he’s polygynist in orientation and would much rather prefer a polygamist lifestyle? It’s acceptable for him to blow up his monogamous marriage to pursue his true self then, I must say.

At 0:30 we hear from Lauren Morelli, the writer at the center of the story. Let’s take her words and apply them to a man in a monogamous situation. “I realized I didn’t want to live a monogamous lifestyle in fall 2012, one of my first days on the set. It wasn’t so much one thing, but the sum of many details: how uncomfortable I’d feel around all of those hot actresses or how I considered myself a ‘not very sexual person.’ When considered alone, these seemed like little quirks that made me me. Wanting to have threesomes or more instead of having sex with just your wife is a perfectly reasonable preference to have, right? I was finally forced to consider a question that had never, ever occurred to me before: Holy sh*t, am I non-monogamous?”

At 2:17 Ana says the following: “I think the scariest thing is, I think that she probably thought, or had suspicions about her sexuality, right? But maybe she was afraid of it, fat_wife2maybe she didn’t want to address it or confront it, and imagine how scary that is to be in a relationship that you know you’re not happy in but you feel kinda trapped.” Let’s apply that to a man that has a 400 pound wife, and doesn’t have sex with her anymore because he gets nauseated just looking at her; the man realizes that he’s only attracted to thinner women. Or again, a man that realizes, after his nuptials, that the monogamous lifestyle is not for him. If he feels trapped, he most certainly shouldn’t have to stay, clearly.

At 2:53 Cenk says that “I think that she started writing for a show about lesbians in order to work out what she was feeling inside, and couldn’t quite put it into words until she put in the words of her character.” So….let’s say a straight male writer starts writing about a guy in high school, who’s surrounded by barely legal girls…he realizes that, even though he’s 40 and married to a 40 year old woman, he can’t seem to keep his mind off of 18 & 19 year old females. He discovers that he wants to only be with girls right 18 and 57out of high school through his cathartic writing.

Then Cenk makes this statement at 3:18: “To me the most amazing part of the story, putting all our goofy kidding aside, is that, how much societal pressure could shut down a person’s natural instincts, right? I mean, she was obviously attracted to women all along, but because of all the expectations and pressure, she so assumed that she must’ve been straight that she didn’t even consider being gay as an option, even though she had already made out with women….isn’t that amazing???” So, a straight non-monogamous guy, even though he’s juggled plates before, after he gets married, because of all the societal pressure and expectation was just assuming that manning up and getting married was who he was, and he didn’t even consider being polygamous as an option, even though he had already had multiple women before….isn’t that amazing???

And, at 4:01, Ana puts the cherry on top of the sundae: “And a lot of people are upset with her, because they feel like she broke up her marriage, and she didn’t work hard enough, and once you take your vows it’s supposed to be as serious as possible which I, look, when you get married, Non-monogamousyou should take your vows seriously, I’m not trying to belittle that, right, but at the same time, what did you want her to do? Remain married to a man she wasn’t in love with, and who she had absolutely no interest in having sex with?” A straight man who’s repulsed by his wife, does he get that same understanding/freedom? If she’s 400 lbs or just if he’s done with monogamy and ready to move on….he has those some options, correct?

There’s more gems in there, but I want to restate: I demand equal rights for straight men who realize after they’re married they do not want fatties, they only like 19 year olds, or they are just simply non-monogamous. In the video they said repeatedly, “This is different! She’s attracted to a whole other gender!” It’s different, really?

So, I’ll ask again: Why do Gay people get a pass? Archie

Not a blog this time for my favorite, but a video. Manospherians are quite familiar with The Sandman. I know this was released at the end of August, but I still wanted to feature it now, because it’s so powerful. Also because #WomenAgainstFeminism is still a thing. This video really speaks for itself: Also check it out on Sandman’s MGTOW site here. I really vibe with this sentiment, as I personally tend to have a long memory. I really hope that men never forget that women’s hypergamous strategy has been laid bare by Feminism, and you will never get her best.

So why should you give her yours?

Why Should Men Propose?

Posted: September 12, 2014 in Marriage, Men, Women
Tags: ,

Man proposesSo I’m trying to figure out why it is that a man today should propose.

And my basic question is this: who stands to gain the most from a marriage?

A woman will gain his last name, total control over their children, a default assumption of innocence in any marital disputes, control over his health and end of life decisions, half of his income in the present, half of it for the future, alimony, child support, access to his pension, and because she gets the children, she gets the house. She can also jail him at any time with accusations of marital rape, or abuse, or exposing pornography to the children, or whatever the heck she wants. Guaranteed and enforced by law. She can even get pregnant by another man, openly cuckolding him, and still force her husband to pay.

So why does HE have to ask HER?

Cash CarWhat does he gain? Absolutely no guarantee of virginity, chastity, fidelity, respect, domestic skill, half of HER income, nothing. What’s hers is hers, and what’s his is hers. A woman has absolutely no legal or social requirement to bring any wifely qualities to the table, nor behave like a wife once she legally becomes one.

A man asking a woman to give him her hand in marriage, is asking for the honor of being put in the worst position he could possibly be in. A position with no rights, all of those belong to her, he just has responsibilities. He is also tying himself to one vagina, Marry Meand the owner of that vagina will use it to control him, as she does not need sex as much as he does. When she needs verbal release, she can go elsewhere. When she needs attention and compliments, she can go elsewhere. When she needs finances, she can go elsewhere.

When he needs sex, he JUST HAS HER. People will say, what about masturbation or porn, but you don’t need a wife for those things. You need a wife for live, real time, in person love making. Which will of course be at her discretion, not his, even though she gets her benefits daily and guaranteed.

So I’ll ask one more time……why, exactly, should a man propose to a woman?

SHE should be proposing to HIM.

propose-woman

Solipsistic in HereIf you ever wanted a glimpse into the thinking of today’s woman, a glimpse into what single men have to choose from, a glimpse into what turned PUAs and MRAs into what they are, I present to you Lauren Martin, and her article from the Feminist Scriptures:

Why Women Need To Start Asking Men Out…Because Men Have No Balls

http://elitedaily.com/dating/men-pssies-women-need-start-asking-men-dates/746965/

There are just too many buckets of solipsistic gold in that article to miss, but I want to highlight a few of my favorite warpings of reality from this woman.

In her introduction she describes her disappointment in today’s men, and paints a picture of unyielding strong-women-weak-menbleakness for any girl hoping to live her dream:

Ladies, it’s been said before, but I’ll say it again: They just don’t make ‘em like they used to.

There’s no door-holding, no hand-holding and definitely no free drinks. There’s no taking off hats or courting through invitations. There are no smooth moves, no jackets to dinner. There are no flowers, no tables by candlelight. But, most importantly, there are no dates.

After too many nights spent in bars and one too many phone numbers given out, you’ve probably realized the sad truth of the situation. You’re not going on any dates or being courted in any type of manner because, unfortunately, men these days are cowards.

Funny how she completely displays her lack of understanding of the male psyche. No true man is a coward. It does not, and obviously will not, occur to her that today’s woman is no prize. There’s nothing there to be won. Men aren’t afraid to pursue….it’s that the end goal simply isn’t worth any pursuit. Not beyond a pump and dump. She continues on in her solipsistic brilliance to prove why.

Well — to be fair here — not all men, but a lot of them.

We’re dealing with a new breed of men here and it’s not the kind we grew up dreaming about. It’s the want-what-I-want-but-don’t-know-how-to-get-it type; it’s the sweet and cuddly mama’s boys who grow up terrified of making the first move; it’s the guys who have so much to say but don’t know how to say it.

Not really, no. It’s the men who grew up under Title IX, men who’ve watched other men get Divorced Raped over and over again, men watching the False Rape Accusation circus, feeling the ball crushing truths of being forced to take the Red Pill, the Death of the Nice Guy, men observing the brain crunching illogical fallacy named ‘The Slutwalk‘ and men who have been Divorce_Cakes_6cruelly exposed to the true nature of women. These men do indeed know how to say what they mean….and what they mean is, “no thanks.”

Now, the unfortunate paradox for a woman is that she must be the chased and the chaser. She must be the target and the shooter. She must play coy and simultaneously pursue him.

Anyone notice the problem here? Yet again, women are left to do all the work. We’re left playing both sides of the game because they’ve simply forgotten how to play.

It stems from a number of factors, but most prominently from the fact that men don’t know what the hell they want from us. They want the virgin and the whore. The want the slut and the good girl. They want the girl who’s hard to get, but they don’t know how to get her.

Because they don’t know what they want, they end up chasing nothing. It’s the dilemma of the overcrowded buffet. There are too many options so they choose an empty plate… or something they don’t even like to begin with.SONY DSC

This leaves women making all the moves. We must tell them what they want if we’re to get anywhere close to the goals we had for ourselves. But it will never be as we fully imagined because, in our dreams, men weren’t timid or scared little boys; in our dreams, men are the ones with the balls to ask us out.

Oh, poor women. They have to be the burden bearers, the risk takers, the decisions makers, the Lions and the Lambs, because us silly men are just scared little boys. Except we aren’t. To quote Judgy Bitch:

Of the 2977 people killed on September 11th, 2001, 414 were NYC emergency personnel who responded to the attack. 341 firefighters, 60 police officers, 8 EMTs and 3 court officers.

Two of those responders were women. The other 412 were men.

Full article here.

The unflappable Ms. Martin then goes on to tell us exactly what is to blame for the current sorry state of men.

They’re scared of you

They’ll never admit it, but you scare the hell out of them. After years of social conditioning, we’ve been duped into thinking that men are the strong ones; that they are the leaders, the protectors and the fighters; that they are the ones that see what they want and go after it.

Well, TV lied to you. Men aren’t these masculine displays of strength and perseverance.

Men are shy, timid and scared sh*tless of any woman with half a brain.

That’s pretty much what it takes to believe that, half a brain. Men have more fear? Incorrect. Women have less value. But she continues.

They got it from their mamasMamasBoy2

Why are men like this? Well, for years they’ve been raised by their mamas, the women who told them they were the best thing God created on this earth. For years, they’ve been given everything on a silver platter — up until the end of college when they were picking up women who just threw up their jungle juice.

Can’t you just smell the cauldron of irony? This coming from a culture that has spent countless ergs of energy championing and supporting single motherhood in spite of the fact that there is overwhelming evidence that children of single mothers do worse in life. But there’s more.

They think there’s always someone better

In the society in which we live today, with Gigi Hadid and Miranda Kerr’s Instagrams readily accessible, women have got a lot to compete with. Fortunately, we’re competing with women these men will never have a shot with. Unfortunately, these men don’t seem to know this.

This is just pure textbook projection. Checkout Exhibit A.

They never grew up

Immature WomenIn a sad, but not all that surprising, report by Nickelodeon UK, men are 11 years behind women in maturity. While women reach maturation by 32, men aren’t fully matured until 43. While this study garnered much attention, women everywhere were less than surprised. Didn’t we already know this?

Men never grow up, hmmm? I’ll just let these gifs right here deal with that. And her conclusion is that the current low rates of marriage are again, the sole fault of males:

To add insult to the few dates you have yet to be asked on, men are also getting married less than ever before. According to a study by Pew Research Center, only 26 percent of Generation-Y is married.

Compared to the 48 percent of our parents at this age, there’s no denying that men just don’t have their sh*t together.

Right, right, because it’s clearly men that are delaying marriage these days. Oh wait.

But the pièce de résistance of this whole piece? The fact that Ms. Martin has failed at everything she’s touched:

LAUREN MARTIN

Lauren “LMoney” Martin grew up with one goal: to be the first woman engineer. Upon finding out there already were women engineers, and unable to pass Calc 1, she chose to study the beautiful and honorable art of advertising. After advertising proved uninspiring, she attempted a career in acting which was over before she could get on stage. And when she failed at everything else she decided to become a writer.

Yes, those lousy men. Too bad they just can’t get their crap together. Even though she has money in her nickname, and she can’t seem to generate any of her own. Even though, as Rollo tweeted today, all the richest women in the world got their wealth from men. That’s right, the Strong and Independent Woman makes money the old fashioned way….she marries into it. Or divorces into it. Or just inherits it. No work involved but the paperwork when you have a vagina.

If women are still wondering why they can’t get married, they should take a good look at Ms. Martin’s expressed thoughts. Men have to pay even if there’s just an engagement, and this is what’s waiting for you, you lucky man! I can’t understand why today’s man would be eschewing marriage, when even so-called Christian woman are rewriting the Bible to make sluthood a virtuous and holy thing. All men today have to look forward to is a washed up carousel rider who’s counting on your income, present and future, to support her while she blames you for every ill in the world. No virtue, no focus on family, delaying marriage, delaying motherhood, hateful attitudes towards men and a totally hostile court system to enforce her every accusation against you with no proof necessary other than her word.

You’ve come a long way, baby.Strong IND 3Strong IND 2

Strong IND

God Loves SlutsHas to be this one(Dalrock did a post on it, and I commented extensively there, but I thought I’d add my two cents in a post of my own), where losing virginity outside of marriage is now a new way to experience God’s love:

http://www.thefrisky.com/2014-09-09/girl-talk-what-losing-my-virginity-taught-me-about-faith/

What is just astounding in that entire post is the language, and the Female Hamster in Turbo Overdrive. There should no longer be any doubt among Manospherians that females have the ability to rationalize anything, ANYTHING, and justify their behavior by their emotions. HAMSTERAnd have no qualms in twisting, warping, or downright ignoring clear scripture to do so. There is no upper limit to the Hypergamy Hamster.

 

 

BUT WHAT JUMPS OUT MOST AT ME WAS WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU REVERSE THE GENDER OF THE AUTHOR.

Let’s look at some passages that she wrote, verbatim, altering them only to seem as if a man had written them:

When I started dating my then-girlfriend, a lapsed Catholic, I hadn’t been to church in over a year, though I still made an effort to pray and study the Bible. My new job was at a church ministry where I disagreed with the leadership’s theology. Proponents of the purity movement would say that I was falling away from the faith and that’s why I started fooling around with women. I no longer had a deep connection with Christ that I was supposed to have, which made me vulnerable to the manipulations of The World.

But this wasn’t my case at all, and the flattening of such a narrative does a disservice to the complexity of faith. Losing my virginity wasn’t the end result of falling away from my faith – it was the beginning of a renewal, of learning to love God and my neighbors more deeply and fully than ever before.

HAH. Can you see a guy justifying his promiscuity in this way and still punching his Christian Card? There’s more:

This also isn’t a conversion story of how losing my virginity made me realize how far away I’d fallen and now I’m chastened, back on the straight-and-narrow and celibate. I’m not celibate and I’m dating around. And I’m a Christian whose faith, at this point, is probably stronger than at any point in my younger years. And I know that this faith, this commitment, wouldn’t have been possible had I not actively made the decision to give up on purity.

Purity, for me and for many men, became a distraction from the Gospel. In evangelicalism, purity is so closely tied to a salvation message that loss of purity is necessarily painted as a loss of faith – and this leaves many men wondering what happens if they do make the decision to have sex, even if it’s in the “right” circumstances. Learning to have sex without shame often creates a crisis of faith because we’re told for years and years that sex is shameful, scary and not something men should want.

HAHAHAH! Keeping it in mah pants was a distraction from the Gospel, so gettin’ my rocks off and forgetting about that whole ‘no fornication’ thing sure did increase mah faith! But here’s the cherry(HUGE punnage intended) on top of it all:

For me, making the decision to have sex without shame, to own that part of myself and to make those decisions, has only improved my faith and my understanding of God’s love. Sex liberated me from my puritanical judgment and strict ideas about what’s right and wrong. It taught me to meet people where they are – just as Jesus did – and in that way, it became a different kind of sacrament. I judge people less now. I don’t wrap my faith up in whether or not I’m performing the rules in the right way. And I understand God’s love for God’s people on a deeper, more personal level than ever before.

Losing my virginity outside of a marriage relationship taught me how to be a better person and a better Christian. It challenged my presuppositions about what sexual health looks like, and brought into stark relief the gaps in my education about ethics and holiness. Sex, in this way, can be a sacrament, a movement toward understanding God, a form of holiness experienced in a deep, mystical way. Sex can be holy, whether or not you have a ring on your finger.

 

Lot. About to make some BABIES!

Lot. About to make some BABIES!

I don’t understand. Why can’t men make this same argument?

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/21888916/ns/us_news-faith/t/megachurch-leader-mega-sized-sex-scandal/#.VBCvJqfF_3o

http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2009/07/former_word_of_life_youth_mini.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/20/jack-schaap-sentenced-ind_n_2918139.html

http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/HowHaggardWasFiredAndWhy.html

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/i-watched-art-school-steal-my-friends-virginity

http://restoringsexualpurity.org/the-sexually-addicted-minister/

I’ll ask it again…..why isn’t this a beautiful, deeply spiritual, Gospel-enhancing experience if men do it? If Jesus made love to Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary Salome, Martha(Lazarus’ brother) and all the other women that followed Him, He’s still just as much the Savior, right? Sluts say Yes

Candace Cameron has been married to an NHL player for seventeen years. Does anyone think that she’s struggling to submit in this case?

Whether Christian or not….women still want the same things. Because they are still wired the same way. There always seems to be, however, an effort among the religious to convince all others that their motivation is their love for God. Could that be true? Of course it could be, far be it from me to presume that I would know someone’s heart.

What I find strange and curious beyond belief, however, is that rarely do I see a woman’s desire to submit seem to hold up if her husband’s not an Alpha. If indeed her motivation is to obey Christ, it should be as the Bible teaches, submission to her husband, not just her Alpha husband.

lisa-whelchel-smiling-660Remember Lisa Whelchel, aka Blair Warner from The Facts of Life? She went from this: http://heavenlyhomemakers.com/chatting-with-lisa-whelchel-about-marriage

to this:  http://global.christianpost.com/news/lisa-whelchel-secretly-divorces-husband-after-23-years-81921/

…..so what gives?

I’ve got a new perspective.

The lie has once again been exposed as being the diametric opposite of the truth.

BetaGinas and White KnuckleHeads still make every effort to pedestalize females into these creatures that are “inherently morally superior” and “more self-controlled” and way more deeply spiritual than males are.

Yeah. Crap.

It’s the other way around, which is why most of the heroes in the Bible are men. Who’s more likely to be committed to their faith, regardless if there’s a pleasure component in it or not, and give their lives for what they believe? Men are. Who’s more likely to hang in there with a marriage that’s going south to try and salvage it? Men are. Who’s more likely to, just in general, take the tenets of whatever faith they daniel-1have more seriously? Men are.

I told you before men, you are the prize.

I’d link to a blog that I think may offer a counterpoint, and showcase women that are at least trying to make an effort to submit to their Beta husbands, but I’ve been asked not to. The husband of the wife that runs this blog, his words to me were, “my blog isn’t the kind of blog that they’d like to get traffic from.”

Hah.Man's World

More proof that Red Pill Truths are indeed accurate, Ravens running back Ray Rice is planning to address the media at 3 p.m. Friday for the first time since he was charged with knockingI give you exhibit 238392232nthX1239 to the umpteenth power, Janay Rice:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/09/janay-rice-response-instagram_n_5790160.html

janay rice

flushingSo, Manosphere articles, posts, blogs, and books can pretty much be summed up as always falling into one of three categories:

1) Female Hypergamy

2) The Male Need for Game

3) Watching 1) and 2) play out in real life

But I’m here to restate this question: How does it all end? Or, more accurately, what is the next Big Thing in male/female relations?

We’ve examined, over and over again, the actual and accurate basics of the Female Imperative. We’ve debunked, time and time again, the false claims of Feminism. More and more men are awakening to the Blue Bill Betaness inside of them, and realizing what their prospects are without nutting/Gaming up. More men are adopting some level of MGTOW, after seeing the awful deal that is Marriage 2.0. That’s not what I’m talking about right now. What I’m talking about now is, what will the next huge cultural shift be? What’s the future that results from all of this going to look like?

Will it be filled with frustrated Betas that finally decide to become MGTOW? Will there simply be less males in the world in NGWOTgeneral? Will the U.S. regress to an earlier time, like the return of Finishing School for women and male chivalry, or go extreme hardcore women-are-property like many countries in the Middle East? Or will enough men with enough power realize that shipping in beautiful wife trained women from other countries will shine an even greater light on how worthless the 21st century American female is? Or will we just go straight on Logan’s Run and say that nobody gets to live past the age of 30?

There aren’t really any stats that I’m aware of that track the number of married Beta men, as being a “Beta Man” isn’t an easily measurable demographic. So let’s look at this article from last year to examine the number of weddings in total:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/06/17/marriage-trends-demographics/2424641/

From 2007 to 2009, the number of marriages each year fell from 2.197 million to 2.080 million. The report estimates that more than 175,000 weddings have been postponed or foregone since the recession began.

Sociologist and demographer Wendy Manning, co-director of the National Center for Family & Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University in Bowling Green, Ohio, says the projected wedding increases “might be overly optimistic.”

“They seem to think the number of weddings is going to increase. That’s possible,” she says. But “not all those marriages are going to be among those young people entering into their first marriages. The report is focusing on the Echo Baby Boomers entering into their marrying years, which is true, but my issue is that one-third of marriages are remarriages, and the remarriages are not among the young people.”

A report based on 2010 data issued by her center last year found that 31% of all people who married that year were remarrying.

The new forecast predicts the marriage rate to remain at the record low of 6.8 marriages per 1,000 population for 2013 (where it’s been since 2009) and notes that the rate was 7.3 in 2007, just before the downturn. In addition, the report predicts that when these couples take their first vows, they’ll probably be older than brides and grooms in the past. By 2015, the company predicts, the average age at first marriage will rise to 29.2 for men and 27.1 for women, up from 28.2 for men and 26.1 for women in 2010.

 

6.8 marriages per 1,000 people, with most of the remarriages being among the young, with everybody pushing 30 before getting married, with same sex marriages stats not even being fully tabulated yet. And now, the number of divorces:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/marriage-divorce.htm

Marriage and Divorce

Data are for the U.S.

  • Number of marriages: 2,118,000
  • Marriage rate: 6.8 per 1,000 total population
  • Divorce rate: 3.6 per 1,000 population (44 reporting States and D.C.

That’s an astonishingly low number of people even braving the waters of marriage, with over half of them wanting out, with women initiating said outness 60-70% of the time:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201311/do-men-or-women-file-divorce-more-often

http://www.divorce-lawyer-source.com/faq/emotional/who-initiates-divorce-men-or-women.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/10357829/Why-do-women-initiate-divorce-more-than-men.html

So if we’re assuming a 5% Alpha Rate, that means that 2 million or so of these marriages(when factoring in Gammas and Deltas) are Beta Marriages. Everyone keeps claiming that the current climate is unsustainable, for genetic, social, and economic reasons(and yes I know those stats are not broken down by age or ethnic group). They say that neither Beta Men nor the State are going to be willing to keep furnishing women with all the rights, all the property, all the education, full control over the children, and all of the income forever, 042014_marrying_807with men paying the bill either through taxes, alimony, or child support.

So what’s the next step?

Every state rushing to legalize prostitution? Doubtful, but if you want to read an experienced perspective on that, check out The Honest Courtesan.

My personal feeling is that Polygamy will begin to surge in the U.S.; with women experiencing less and less available men, they will be more honest about their desire to share an Alpha Male than be stuck somewhere with a schlubbing Beta.

There also might be room for Marriage 3.0….something that on the surface seems more equitable for men, but again, it will be aimed primarily at the Beta Men still wanting to marry.

So what do Manospherians think? What will the next big Cultural Shift be?next-big-thing-ahead

 

Options

Posted: September 8, 2014 in Marriage, Men, Wife, Women

wedSo I was inspired by this post to ask this question:

What are the wife options for a contemporary man interested in marriage?

1. Finding a Virgin

Pretty much unless you can cozy up to a family like The Duggars, you don’t really have a high probability of finding a woman that’s kept herself pure. There were some interesting comments over at Dalrock’s after I asked a question about whether most virgins were 1-3s in terms of SMV or 7-10s. The general pushback was, that I shouldn’t assume that there weren’t any people out there committed to pre-marital chastity, and that somehow my perception had been warped by my life experiences. Also, that I didn’t have enough data to back up my assertion that the vast majority of women will give up their purity if the right man is asking.

certificate-of-virginitySo, are there organizations that say, “Virgins found in here, y’all?” If you are not around or affiliated with a social or organized church group, then, is there a Chastity GPS app I don’t know about?

2. Low N Count Women

It’s generally assumed that low N Count is better, but it only takes one Alpha Cad to ruin a woman for life. There are articles floating around out there that still suggest that having multiple sex partners takes a greater toll on women than it does on men, even though there can be pronounced effects on both genders. So I ask, if you’re a man considering marriage, is low N count acceptable to you? And how low? Single digits? What’s the cutoff number for acceptability?

3. Carousel Riders

Much has been said in the Manosphere about this topic, but the fact remains, women prefer bad boys:

So you need to realize, that barring unusual circumstances, any woman that you meet over the age of 13 is going to be excited about the carousel, and won’t be worrying about marriage until she feels The Wall approaching. That means for a man that hasn’t learned Game, ex loversor is not a natural or self-developed Alpha, your wife prospects are primarily going to consist of ex-carousel riders. Remember, that in today’s environment, women no longer understand why being an ex-carousel rider looking for a husband would be a problem.

4. Single Mothers

You have no way of knowing, ever, if a woman is telling the truth about the number of men she’s been with. When there’s a child involved, however, you have living evidence of how you will never have a relationship just with her. It will always be with the child, and the child’s father, regardless of where or who he is. Judgy Bitch deals with this topic better than anyone I’ve seen yet.

So I’m still trying to ascertain how, given today’s climate, a man that is interested in marriage should approach finding a suitable wife.confused-man1