Archive for the ‘Wife’ Category

Candace Cameron has been married to an NHL player for seventeen years. Does anyone think that she’s struggling to submit in this case?

Whether Christian or not….women still want the same things. Because they are still wired the same way. There always seems to be, however, an effort among the religious to convince all others that their motivation is their love for God. Could that be true? Of course it could be, far be it from me to presume that I would know someone’s heart.

What I find strange and curious beyond belief, however, is that rarely do I see a woman’s desire to submit seem to hold up if her husband’s not an Alpha. If indeed her motivation is to obey Christ, it should be as the Bible teaches, submission to her husband, not just her Alpha husband.

lisa-whelchel-smiling-660Remember Lisa Whelchel, aka Blair Warner from The Facts of Life? She went from this: http://heavenlyhomemakers.com/chatting-with-lisa-whelchel-about-marriage

to this:  http://global.christianpost.com/news/lisa-whelchel-secretly-divorces-husband-after-23-years-81921/

…..so what gives?

I’ve got a new perspective.

The lie has once again been exposed as being the diametric opposite of the truth.

BetaGinas and White KnuckleHeads still make every effort to pedestalize females into these creatures that are “inherently morally superior” and “more self-controlled” and way more deeply spiritual than males are.

Yeah. Crap.

It’s the other way around, which is why most of the heroes in the Bible are men. Who’s more likely to be committed to their faith, regardless if there’s a pleasure component in it or not, and give their lives for what they believe? Men are. Who’s more likely to hang in there with a marriage that’s going south to try and salvage it? Men are. Who’s more likely to, just in general, take the tenets of whatever faith they daniel-1have more seriously? Men are.

I told you before men, you are the prize.

I’d link to a blog that I think may offer a counterpoint, and showcase women that are at least trying to make an effort to submit to their Beta husbands, but I’ve been asked not to. The husband of the wife that runs this blog, his words to me were, “my blog isn’t the kind of blog that they’d like to get traffic from.”

Hah.Man's World

Advertisements

More proof that Red Pill Truths are indeed accurate, Ravens running back Ray Rice is planning to address the media at 3 p.m. Friday for the first time since he was charged with knockingI give you exhibit 238392232nthX1239 to the umpteenth power, Janay Rice:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/09/janay-rice-response-instagram_n_5790160.html

janay rice

flushingSo, Manosphere articles, posts, blogs, and books can pretty much be summed up as always falling into one of three categories:

1) Female Hypergamy

2) The Male Need for Game

3) Watching 1) and 2) play out in real life

But I’m here to restate this question: How does it all end? Or, more accurately, what is the next Big Thing in male/female relations?

We’ve examined, over and over again, the actual and accurate basics of the Female Imperative. We’ve debunked, time and time again, the false claims of Feminism. More and more men are awakening to the Blue Bill Betaness inside of them, and realizing what their prospects are without nutting/Gaming up. More men are adopting some level of MGTOW, after seeing the awful deal that is Marriage 2.0. That’s not what I’m talking about right now. What I’m talking about now is, what will the next huge cultural shift be? What’s the future that results from all of this going to look like?

Will it be filled with frustrated Betas that finally decide to become MGTOW? Will there simply be less males in the world in NGWOTgeneral? Will the U.S. regress to an earlier time, like the return of Finishing School for women and male chivalry, or go extreme hardcore women-are-property like many countries in the Middle East? Or will enough men with enough power realize that shipping in beautiful wife trained women from other countries will shine an even greater light on how worthless the 21st century American female is? Or will we just go straight on Logan’s Run and say that nobody gets to live past the age of 30?

There aren’t really any stats that I’m aware of that track the number of married Beta men, as being a “Beta Man” isn’t an easily measurable demographic. So let’s look at this article from last year to examine the number of weddings in total:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/06/17/marriage-trends-demographics/2424641/

From 2007 to 2009, the number of marriages each year fell from 2.197 million to 2.080 million. The report estimates that more than 175,000 weddings have been postponed or foregone since the recession began.

Sociologist and demographer Wendy Manning, co-director of the National Center for Family & Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University in Bowling Green, Ohio, says the projected wedding increases “might be overly optimistic.”

“They seem to think the number of weddings is going to increase. That’s possible,” she says. But “not all those marriages are going to be among those young people entering into their first marriages. The report is focusing on the Echo Baby Boomers entering into their marrying years, which is true, but my issue is that one-third of marriages are remarriages, and the remarriages are not among the young people.”

A report based on 2010 data issued by her center last year found that 31% of all people who married that year were remarrying.

The new forecast predicts the marriage rate to remain at the record low of 6.8 marriages per 1,000 population for 2013 (where it’s been since 2009) and notes that the rate was 7.3 in 2007, just before the downturn. In addition, the report predicts that when these couples take their first vows, they’ll probably be older than brides and grooms in the past. By 2015, the company predicts, the average age at first marriage will rise to 29.2 for men and 27.1 for women, up from 28.2 for men and 26.1 for women in 2010.

 

6.8 marriages per 1,000 people, with most of the remarriages being among the young, with everybody pushing 30 before getting married, with same sex marriages stats not even being fully tabulated yet. And now, the number of divorces:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/marriage-divorce.htm

Marriage and Divorce

Data are for the U.S.

  • Number of marriages: 2,118,000
  • Marriage rate: 6.8 per 1,000 total population
  • Divorce rate: 3.6 per 1,000 population (44 reporting States and D.C.

That’s an astonishingly low number of people even braving the waters of marriage, with over half of them wanting out, with women initiating said outness 60-70% of the time:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201311/do-men-or-women-file-divorce-more-often

http://www.divorce-lawyer-source.com/faq/emotional/who-initiates-divorce-men-or-women.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/10357829/Why-do-women-initiate-divorce-more-than-men.html

So if we’re assuming a 5% Alpha Rate, that means that 2 million or so of these marriages(when factoring in Gammas and Deltas) are Beta Marriages. Everyone keeps claiming that the current climate is unsustainable, for genetic, social, and economic reasons(and yes I know those stats are not broken down by age or ethnic group). They say that neither Beta Men nor the State are going to be willing to keep furnishing women with all the rights, all the property, all the education, full control over the children, and all of the income forever, 042014_marrying_807with men paying the bill either through taxes, alimony, or child support.

So what’s the next step?

Every state rushing to legalize prostitution? Doubtful, but if you want to read an experienced perspective on that, check out The Honest Courtesan.

My personal feeling is that Polygamy will begin to surge in the U.S.; with women experiencing less and less available men, they will be more honest about their desire to share an Alpha Male than be stuck somewhere with a schlubbing Beta.

There also might be room for Marriage 3.0….something that on the surface seems more equitable for men, but again, it will be aimed primarily at the Beta Men still wanting to marry.

So what do Manospherians think? What will the next big Cultural Shift be?next-big-thing-ahead

 

Options

Posted: September 8, 2014 in Marriage, Men, Wife, Women

wedSo I was inspired by this post to ask this question:

What are the wife options for a contemporary man interested in marriage?

1. Finding a Virgin

Pretty much unless you can cozy up to a family like The Duggars, you don’t really have a high probability of finding a woman that’s kept herself pure. There were some interesting comments over at Dalrock’s after I asked a question about whether most virgins were 1-3s in terms of SMV or 7-10s. The general pushback was, that I shouldn’t assume that there weren’t any people out there committed to pre-marital chastity, and that somehow my perception had been warped by my life experiences. Also, that I didn’t have enough data to back up my assertion that the vast majority of women will give up their purity if the right man is asking.

certificate-of-virginitySo, are there organizations that say, “Virgins found in here, y’all?” If you are not around or affiliated with a social or organized church group, then, is there a Chastity GPS app I don’t know about?

2. Low N Count Women

It’s generally assumed that low N Count is better, but it only takes one Alpha Cad to ruin a woman for life. There are articles floating around out there that still suggest that having multiple sex partners takes a greater toll on women than it does on men, even though there can be pronounced effects on both genders. So I ask, if you’re a man considering marriage, is low N count acceptable to you? And how low? Single digits? What’s the cutoff number for acceptability?

3. Carousel Riders

Much has been said in the Manosphere about this topic, but the fact remains, women prefer bad boys:

So you need to realize, that barring unusual circumstances, any woman that you meet over the age of 13 is going to be excited about the carousel, and won’t be worrying about marriage until she feels The Wall approaching. That means for a man that hasn’t learned Game, ex loversor is not a natural or self-developed Alpha, your wife prospects are primarily going to consist of ex-carousel riders. Remember, that in today’s environment, women no longer understand why being an ex-carousel rider looking for a husband would be a problem.

4. Single Mothers

You have no way of knowing, ever, if a woman is telling the truth about the number of men she’s been with. When there’s a child involved, however, you have living evidence of how you will never have a relationship just with her. It will always be with the child, and the child’s father, regardless of where or who he is. Judgy Bitch deals with this topic better than anyone I’ve seen yet.

So I’m still trying to ascertain how, given today’s climate, a man that is interested in marriage should approach finding a suitable wife.confused-man1

Red Pill EndGame

Posted: February 21, 2014 in Game, Life, Men, Wife
Tags: , , ,

Old manJust musing on my own answer to this question….as a man, how do you want to end up?

Let’s assume a life span of 80 years. When you come to the end of your days, do you:

-Want to have lots of kids, either by one wife, or many wives and/or baby mommas?

-Want to have a high N count, and be proud as  you die that you nailed a lot of women?

-Want to have a natural heir to pass your worldly goods on to?Old_Man_(Imagicity_854)

-Want to pass knowing that no woman will directly inherit your estate(because some of your estate tax will end up going to women eventually)?

-Want to still be pulling 25 year old Sugar Babies and popping Viagra like candy?

26266439-Want to have a traditional ending, where you’ve spent 50+ years with one woman, and you both die within days of each other, because you  don’t want to live without your lifelong partner?

oldman (1)As we spend our lives mastering whatever level of Game we aspire to, recognizing that sluts are not wives, and that wives and children are resource drainers with no guarantee of positive ROI, where does it all end? As we realize that women must be controlled at all times, under all situations lest the destroy everything that men have built, is that the ultimate point of learning Game? sugar_daddyTo be a woman tamer? Is our job only to enjoy the spoils of our increased knowledge and to unplug other men that are willing to learn? Let me know in the comments and in the poll.

Cersei-cersei-lannister-31147140-1279-691“When you play the Game of Thrones…you win. Or you die. There is no middle ground.” ~Cersei Lannister

Know what needs to happen, stat? Men need to accept the above axiom as the bottom line for relationships with females. The Female Imperative(seek the strongest seed, ignore all but the top prospects, secure the highest amount of status & resources possible while giving away as little sex as possible, and at any sign of weakness? Seek a new target, lather, rinse, repeat) is completely incompatible with the Male Imperative(spread your seed into as many virginal young fertile prime wombs as possible, and lockdown said womb to ensure purity and paternity of seed so there is no wasted investment of resources or skewed legacy). Let’s let Cersei herself tell her story:

Did you catch all that? Cersei was having the happiest day of her life, as she believed she had scored the Alphaiest of Alphas…King Robert Baratheon himself. Yet when she discovered he was weak in bed, and his drunken heart still belonged to his dead wife, she immediately, and without hesitation, cuckolded him. With her brother. Ensuring that every heir to the Baratheon throne would be an incest born, illegitimate abomination. And she’s proud of that decision.

Serial monogamy and never ending polygamy don’t live on the same street. Your life as a man is either going to be living your dream, or living her dream. Your dream can only be achieved through Game and continually elevating status, even if you want access to just one womb. If that womb is wrapped in the youngest and the prettiest flesh possible, you have no chance for impregnation without swagger and bling. And you will soon discover that you have to plate spin even if you have only one plate.

ball-and-chain-cake-topper01If, however, you do as most men and get chumped into living her dream, you are going to spend your life giving her every resource that you have: time, attention, money, energy, regardless of how much sex or respect you get in return. She’ll either Girl Game it out of you or legally enforce it out of you, or both. You might negotiate a Hall Pass, but only the highest status men can do that; if you’re Bill Gates, your wife is not about to give up that lifestyle just because you got some side poontang. It’s also why Hillary stayed married to Bill. She’d have never gotten as far career wise as a divorced woman, as an ex-first lady. Would not have happened. If you’re a janitor, however, better call your lawyer. It’s a slow death for most men, as they have to find a way to suppress their natural desire for polygamy for 40 years; God help you if you are a Christian man, because nowadays your wife and the Pastoral mangina you serve under even count masturbation as cheating. Do you get that? You signed up to have only one legitimate source of sex for the rest of your life, and you have to continue to Game it to keep it active. If not, it will get old, fat, bitchy, take all that you have, including your offspring, and leave you to rot with no remorse whatsoever. And she just might do that anyway, especially if a better alternative presents itself and you have been slumming into BetaLand just a leeetle too long.

Lord Baelish, Lord Varys, the Tyrells, and the Lannisters, they never rest. Petyr-baelish-1024They sleep with one eye open. They have spies. Their walls have ears. Know why? Because they understand that the tide can turn at any minute; all it takes is one decision. And the most Blue Pillingest of all families, the Starks? Those that put duty starkand honor and love above all else? They keep dying. Slaughtered. Because they don’t understand what game they’re playing. Men have not yet accepted that women don’t care about you beyond your usefulness to them. This is why initial Red Pill shock is so intense; because most men have no idea how easily their woman can replace them with another workhorse.

The big raging debate around the ‘Sphere these days is whether or not Game is compatible with Scripture and Christian values; my contention is that that is the wrong question. And that’s because it’s partly rooted in the fallacy that there’s a difference between Christian women and non-Christian women. Whether a woman is a believer in, and a follower of Christ or not is irrelevant to how and why she responds to you. That’s what people seem to keep getting confused about. The women will keep trying to insist that they are submissive because that’s what God tells them to do. Wrong again. Because they are not submissive to Beta men. Only Alphas; the dominant, the strong, the fun, the confident….The Gamers. Do we understand yet that the only way to ensure that a young lass will keep her purity is to basically lock her down, surrounded by a constant guard of father and brothers? She is driven to find the worst thug, criminal, or player possible to deflower her, and there is no way for her to avoid that path besides isolation. The only difference among women is NOT whether or not they have that drive….only whether or not they will submit to that protection. Otherwise it’s over, those legs will open like a Wal-Mart on Black Friday. But for some reason, Christian men seem to completely ignore the following verse:

I Peter 3:7 – Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.

Did you get that?? ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE. Knowledge about how women work. And because she is weaker than you. Your strength, your knowledge, your confidence, your leadership, your dominance. These are the qualities that lead to tingles, and tingles are what lead to submission. She’s not gonna read the Bible and get wet over you. She’s gonna respond to how you treat her. Just like God said she would.SUBMIT

Ephesians 5:25-27 – Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; that he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, that he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.

There it is again….she only gets wrinkle and blemish free because of what you say to her.

And you think that God doesn’t use Game? Guess again:

Deuteronomy 32:21 – They have moved me to jealousy with that which is not God; they have provoked me to anger with their vanities: and I will move them to jealousy with those which are not a people; I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation. 

Matthew 21:43Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
Provocation to jealousy and anger with the threat of a new lover, and a threat of removal of resources….any of that sound familiar?
So once and for all men, stop thinking that Game is a contradiction of your faith or vice versa. You will scream, “BUT THEY USE GAME FOR FORNICATION!!!” Guess what? You have to use Game to attract a potential bride and Game to keep her. If you don’t have any Game skills I hope you can get used to loving your hand; that’s the only thing in your life that’ll be singing Here Comes the Bride. So I don’t care if you’re living holier than a cargo ship full of Swiss cheese, women are only going to respond to you the way you want them to, whether girlfriend, fiance, or wife, because of Game.
And if you don’t understand or accept that, you will die a slow death.DIE SLOW

2012-celebs-topic-why-did-i-get-married-tooOne of my readers has summed up what I’ve been trying to say precisely:

DaPoet says:

Unfortunately one of of the many things those in the so called manosphere have in common with the feminists is the surrendering of one’s independence by conforming to the opinions held by the majority of the group. This is why I’m neither a feminist or an MRA.

Any red piller claiming to be happily married is either:

-ok with his wife holding a gun to the side of his head with the hammer cocked back and her finger on the trigger, Or

-believes that not all women are like that or

-his woman isn’t like that and/or

-is ignoring the salient fact that he has no rights whatsoever nor any power within the marriage.

All of which are characteristics of blue pill males.

This is what I’ve been wondering/trying to ask Red Pill men that are married. Why, exactly, did you get married?

married-men-happierI would like to hear from happily married men. My blog is about men taking the Red Pill, and understanding how male/female relationships actually work, vs. the way we think they work, and/or what we’re taught to believe.

If you’re in the Manosphere(so we can hear an accurate testimony and not a PC one), and you’re a happily married man, give your testimony on this post. Specifically what I’m looking for is:

-Testimony as to how getting married was a good choice

-Specific details about the joys of marriage for you

-Whether or not you’d highly recommend marriage to men that are seeking it

-If you’re a person of any faith, how your faith has helped in your marriage

Let’s hear from the happily married men!mm

groom1I briefly talked about the quasi-flipside of this question here. I now have to ponder the issues of what would motivate today’s man to enter into a covenantal, contractual relationship that’s almost 100% stacked against him, knowing full well that the authority of the State is also aligned against him, no matter what, once he signs. Let’s take a look at the factors that men generally consider when choosing a bride:

Virginity – Nothing as attractive as a woman that will be all yours sexually, at least initially. Some guys have weird sharing fetishes, but barring that, this gives your future wife a chance to bond with you and only you, with no other men to compete with in her head, heart, or body.

N Count – This is teachmanhuge in terms of the number of sexual partners she’s had before you. Statistically that will determine her likelihood of Frivorcing you, and most likely her ability to bond with you.

Age – As I’ve said repeatedly, she will look her best and freshest between the ages of 15 and 30; after that, she’ll start to hit The Wall.

Physical Beauty – This is deeply subjective, but it’s always a factor for men. Most of the time, it’s the deciding factor as to whether or not we’ll even initiate the relationship.

Respect, Public & Private – This is pretty simple; her attitude and behavioral manner towards you in any setting.

Disposition – Is she sweet, sour, sassy, all of the above, and most importantly, how often does it change?

Personality – What kind of person is she, and does her style of living life gel with yours?

Children – Her willingness to give you any, and whether or not she already has some by another man.

Her Income – Old school men were raised with the expectation of being a full provider for the family. New school men expect their potential wives to work. This will tie into children as well, if the decision is made for her to become a SAHM.

Domestic Skill – Her ability to manage a house, including finances, cooking, cleaning and any other domestic duties necessary.

Previous Marriages – We’ve got funny ways of defining “committed relationships” these days, so I’ll count marriages, as vows were actually taken with some other man at some point.

I’ve talked extensively about what can happen if you’re Frivorced, and anyone that’s been in the Manosphere understands the social and legal climate’s aggressive hatred of men. I’ve also listed Men’s Groups and suggested that each reader join one in his area to begin to work on changing the aforementioned climate.

My question is…..is the right combination of the above elements enough to make you want to jump the broom? Let me hear from you gentlemen in this poll: 

 

 

 

203387_1I’m not raising the question because I’ve formulated a solid answer yet. I’m raising the question because in considering the variables I earnestly began to wonder about it. Let’s examine what women like:

1) Tingles – This comes from finding a man that’s confidant, dominant, and rebellious….the Alpha traits of not caring what society’s rules and expectations are, but going his own way(Ironic, isn’t it?). A man that’s not afraid to take what he wants, a man that would never make his woman his mission or his life, a man that doesn’t take her crap(which is the biggest A on the shit test scale that you can get). Preferably taller, obviously stronger, and everything else after that(bald/hair, tattoos, clear skin, etc.) is a matter of her personal taste. When females are young, extra tingles for banging a man that their father would hate. Notice also that it’s not sex in general that women crave; it’s sex with particular men that they want.

2) Status – Women love a man with status, and it’s always relative. They love a man at the top of his high profile game; athletes, clergyman, politicians, musicians. Women want to know who the most powerful man in the room is; the man that can command all the attention of the other men; they want that guy’s attention. You’re hot when you’re the Mayor of a city; but when the Governor of the State walks in, your wife will get flushed with lust. Whether she acts on it or not, her mind immediately races to “what would it be like to be with him?”

Women also crave the status of being Mrs. Somebody. Being taken. Being in a relationship. A wedding to a woman not only gives her all the focus & attention(ding!) and makes her the prettiest woman in the room(ding ding!), but also is a day where a man stands up before God, clergy, family and friends and says to the world, “I want her. I choose her. I take her.” So females, if they bottom line themselves, want the status of not being alone(which they call “settling” when they are Post Wall), but they always want the highest status man to be attached to that they can get. The higher the status of the male, the higher her tingles.

This is also the fundamental difference between a girl and a woman. A girl can be satisfied, at least at first, with 1) and 2). But a woman, especially one that has or wants children knows that she needs:

3) Resources – Financial security. Provision for herself, her lifestyle, protection for when she’s pregnant and ensuring that there’s nothing to worry about once the children come. A fine home/mansion/roof over their heads, plenty of clothes, shoes, food, and whatever else her heart desires. Women in the last 45 years have made a fuss about female economic empowerment, but you need to check out Judgy Bitch’s post here on what the numbers actually look like in terms of the workforce. Sisters claim that they’re “doing it for themselves,” but they ALWAYS want your resources if you’re a man, regardless of how much of their own they have.

So the question becomes….if a woman gets married, what incentives would she have to stay married? gold-diggers-funny-women-pictures

Incentive 1: Tingles – This only happens if she landed an Alpha in the first place. What women have a hard time accepting is that true Alpha men? Have harems. She will always be one woman among several if she somehow gets an Alpha to marry her. Many women try to change that, and the men just laugh at them, because women are incapable of processing the fact that just as hypergamy is natural to them, polygamy is natural to men. Women want the highest status man possible, men want as many of the youngest & prettiest females to impregnate as possible. Simple. But good luck getting some females to “just get it.” Others of course do, and agree to soft harems, unspoken harems, open marriages, plural marriages, or swinging. Many women don’t care if their husbands screw around, because women place little value on physical intimacy(note to men: THIS IS A HINT).

The problem comes in when we face the fact that there just aren’t enough true Alpha men to go around….which yields the ugly truth that many women marry men that they have little to no attraction to. Remember: there is no premium on physical intimacy in the female value scale. This is why, when we see the stat of 70% of divorces initiated by women; we can easily conclude that women that have Alphas and jettison them are still young enough to get another one. Most women that stay with Alphas are past their prime anyway, and know they have little chance of doing better. So, older women(35+) with Alphas are the most likely to stay married to them.

Incentive 2: Status – This is the Hillary Clinton thing. She’s always known that she could accomplish more in life and politics if she stayed Mrs. Bill Clinton than anything else. People wouldn’t even refer to her as anything else but “the former Mrs. Clinton” if she had left him. As I said here however, if a man takes a turn for the worse and his status decreases, or leaves altogether? His wife will be gone within three to six months. As men learn the hard way, a man with no status is like a woman with no beauty; people just aren’t interested. If you are a man of low status, you can rest assured that your wife feels like she settled for you, and you weren’t even her third or fourth choice. For whatever reason, she couldn’t do any better, and she’s going to convey the seething contempt and disdain she has for that fact on to you, every single day of the relationship, unless and until you become more important in her eyes. Deti’s long running acclaim that attraction cannot be generated from nothing is apropos here. Because I say, just as a man’s sense of love is inextricably tied into the physical, a woman’s love is inextricably tied into status.

Incentive 3: Resources – This is the big kahuna. how-do-you-know-if-she-s-a-gold-digger-95594067-oct-5-2012-1-600x400The State has now guaranteed that a woman has legal access to your resources regardless of any circumstance. She can literally strip you of everything that you have, and make you pay for a family you no longer get any direct benefits from. This is also always a woman’s biggest long term concern in a marriage; it doesn’t matter how the relationship starts, this will be the central issue between you. So if she was never sexually attracted to you to begin with, or she lost attraction because you either became too Beta or lost your job status, or God help you, both, she can still have the State sanctioned legally enforced financial security that she needs. Alphas that stay Alphas have no problem, but there’s only a few DiCaprios and Clooneys in the world. She will never care that much about sex, and will never have any problem getting it. But she no longer needs a man to do anything but impregnate her. Women feel that the kids are theirs, and that mothering is all a child needs, fathering is optional, and most men find out the hard way that she doesn’t want you, she wants your resources.

 

So I’ll ask the question again: Why Would a Woman Stay Married?