Posts Tagged ‘sluts’

God Loves SlutsHas to be this one(Dalrock did a post on it, and I commented extensively there, but I thought I’d add my two cents in a post of my own), where losing virginity outside of marriage is now a new way to experience God’s love:

What is just astounding in that entire post is the language, and the Female Hamster in Turbo Overdrive. There should no longer be any doubt among Manospherians that females have the ability to rationalize anything, ANYTHING, and justify their behavior by their emotions. HAMSTERAnd have no qualms in twisting, warping, or downright ignoring clear scripture to do so. There is no upper limit to the Hypergamy Hamster.




Let’s look at some passages that she wrote, verbatim, altering them only to seem as if a man had written them:

When I started dating my then-girlfriend, a lapsed Catholic, I hadn’t been to church in over a year, though I still made an effort to pray and study the Bible. My new job was at a church ministry where I disagreed with the leadership’s theology. Proponents of the purity movement would say that I was falling away from the faith and that’s why I started fooling around with women. I no longer had a deep connection with Christ that I was supposed to have, which made me vulnerable to the manipulations of The World.

But this wasn’t my case at all, and the flattening of such a narrative does a disservice to the complexity of faith. Losing my virginity wasn’t the end result of falling away from my faith – it was the beginning of a renewal, of learning to love God and my neighbors more deeply and fully than ever before.

HAH. Can you see a guy justifying his promiscuity in this way and still punching his Christian Card? There’s more:

This also isn’t a conversion story of how losing my virginity made me realize how far away I’d fallen and now I’m chastened, back on the straight-and-narrow and celibate. I’m not celibate and I’m dating around. And I’m a Christian whose faith, at this point, is probably stronger than at any point in my younger years. And I know that this faith, this commitment, wouldn’t have been possible had I not actively made the decision to give up on purity.

Purity, for me and for many men, became a distraction from the Gospel. In evangelicalism, purity is so closely tied to a salvation message that loss of purity is necessarily painted as a loss of faith – and this leaves many men wondering what happens if they do make the decision to have sex, even if it’s in the “right” circumstances. Learning to have sex without shame often creates a crisis of faith because we’re told for years and years that sex is shameful, scary and not something men should want.

HAHAHAH! Keeping it in mah pants was a distraction from the Gospel, so gettin’ my rocks off and forgetting about that whole ‘no fornication’ thing sure did increase mah faith! But here’s the cherry(HUGE punnage intended) on top of it all:

For me, making the decision to have sex without shame, to own that part of myself and to make those decisions, has only improved my faith and my understanding of God’s love. Sex liberated me from my puritanical judgment and strict ideas about what’s right and wrong. It taught me to meet people where they are – just as Jesus did – and in that way, it became a different kind of sacrament. I judge people less now. I don’t wrap my faith up in whether or not I’m performing the rules in the right way. And I understand God’s love for God’s people on a deeper, more personal level than ever before.

Losing my virginity outside of a marriage relationship taught me how to be a better person and a better Christian. It challenged my presuppositions about what sexual health looks like, and brought into stark relief the gaps in my education about ethics and holiness. Sex, in this way, can be a sacrament, a movement toward understanding God, a form of holiness experienced in a deep, mystical way. Sex can be holy, whether or not you have a ring on your finger.


Lot. About to make some BABIES!

Lot. About to make some BABIES!

I don’t understand. Why can’t men make this same argument?

I’ll ask it again…..why isn’t this a beautiful, deeply spiritual, Gospel-enhancing experience if men do it? If Jesus made love to Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary Salome, Martha(Lazarus’ brother) and all the other women that followed Him, He’s still just as much the Savior, right? Sluts say Yes



  • Sexual burn out. Sexual Burn Out. SEXUAL BURN OUT. American sluts, copying the behavior sold to them in movies and TV, get fucked by so many men who pump-and-dump them that by age 30 their pussies are like Ozzie Osbourne’s brain: exhausted, spent, and hopeless. Sex is self-perpetuating for men: the more we get, the more we like it and the more we want it. (This is the Coolidge Effect in action.) But women are designed to be discriminating. Their perverted, feminist liberation nymphomania in their teens and early-twenties is an abominable lifestyle which strips them of their love of men and their ability for passion.

This post on ‘Sahara Snatch’ is showing yet another detriment to a woman having a high N Count; her body begins to shut down sooner. She may lose fertility altogether by her mid 30’s; no eggs, no hormones, no period, no drive. Lord have mercy.

confused_womanVox’s Post has made my week: Fourteen Years of Fun.

If you ever needed a crystal clear picture as to what 40 years of Feminism and 16 years of YouGoGrrl culture has done to the dating scene, all you need do is read that post. You need to also include in your reading Masculine By Design’s Women Who Live Their Life In Reverse. It’s the perfect companion piece to Vox’s post. It expands the Feminist view of a woman’s life to include every stage.

The Indian woman in Vox’s post doesn’t understand why she doesn’t have the same options as her Caucasian peers. She doesn’t understand why a Traditionalist culture like India who still very much believes in marrying young through arranged marriages wouldn’t welcome her back with open arms. She doesn’t understand why men aren’t plentiful in her 30s like they were in her 20s. And more than anything else, she doesn’t understand that she reaped exactly what she sowed. She wanted to have fun….so she attracted men that wanted to have fun. She didn’t want a husband….so she attracted men that didn’t want to be married. Her confusion is akin to a person that plants a farm full of corn seeds and then laments, “Why do I have all these stalks of corn growing on my farm?”

Whether you’re a MGHOW or not, you should talk to your sisters, your daughters, your cousins, and tell them the truth. That woman may not end up a spinster, but what man do you know that really wants to marry a woman who says she “only slept with 18 guys?” (We know that’s a lie. She’s discounting any blowjobs or handjobs she gave, and any one night stands or drunken adventures she had. That’s just 18 actual boyfriends.) I’ve also discovered that “committed relationship” means “I’m doing the guys in a row, not a circle.”

So if I haven’t been clear enough, let me state it unequivocally:

A high traffic vagina is not an attractive selling feature for marriage.sluts-life-s-play-things-4b1a3d I posted this comment at Sunshine Mary’s: –

Would they really be willing to marry/partner with a woman who had participated on film in oral and anal sex with numerous partners? The men said yes, so long as she was still willing to do so with him. I was startled by this because many men here say that they are absolutely firm in their resolve not to marry a non-virgin, but some of the men at RT’s say they would be willing to marry/partner with a hardcore slut so long as she was still willing to perform a variety of sex acts.

Understand clearly that many of those men are outright lying, but it may, *may,* not be on purpose. They may be ignoring the true long term male response.
When a man thinks about a woman he’s involved with, or even attracted to, being slutty? It’s a temporary turn on, accent on the temporary. And his first response is, “Well if she gives it up easily and enthusiastically, let me see if *I* can get some.” That’s just the first response.
Even if he can get her to do what she’s done with others, once he releases/calms down/is sexually sated, those images start to literally haunt him, if he’s emotionally involved with her at all. He can’t get them out of his head, and he will want to ask her questions about her activities, and there are no good answers that she could give. It will soon become a source of frustration for him.

Remember this: just as women think about men differently based on where they are in their ovulatory cycle, so do men think about women differently based on our stage of arousal.

There are quite a few men that would be disgusted with a wife like that over time; fun to lay with, but frustrating to think about all the things she’s done beforehand. And, normally men start to lose trust for her, as they will begin to wonder what she does when not in his presence. And if they ever break up, men are convinced that she’ll be slutting it up very quickly with someone new, which most often is true. They will also not be comfortable with any of her male “friends.”

I realize that so much of this is rooted in the Madonna/Whore complex, but, it’s a part of most male thinking. Consider it a male version of solipsism.

The only exception are true cuckolds; and men that are true cuckolds have low self-esteem, hate themselves, and are quite often bisexual. They enjoy being humiliated, and enjoy watching an Alpha/bull give their wives what they cannot, and often participate by submitting to the bull themselves. They just don’t feel worthy of being called a man, hence the submissive behavior.

Other than that…’s a turn on if I can get it too, but a torment when we’re sitting down to dinner or when I’m at work and she said she was meeting a ‘friend’ for lunch.
Men love to use sluts, but we find out to our everlasting chagrin that we will never fully trust them.

….and I think I’ve found partial male solipsism. That’s not fully accurate as to what it is, but the point is, it’s a way in which men fool themselves about potential or current wives. I can’t imagine any man being completely comfortable with his wife’s former or current extra-marital activities, no matter what he says. However, there are men who seem to be comfortably married to prostitutes.

When it comes to any woman that you’re emotionally, and not just sexually involved with as a man, there are always two parts to the mix if she is a current or former slut: attraction and revulsion. Men are wildly turned on by the idea of women that give it up easily and often…unfortunately, many men do not tell the truth about some of the revulsion that they feel if they allow themselves to dwell on her sluttery.

So I really wanted to throw it out to the Manosphere….do you think a man can ever totally be comfortable with, or fully trust a woman that’s been loose in her past, or has any occasion to be with other men in the present(primarily sex workers)?

The Red Pill Playa

Posted: December 5, 2013 in Red Pill Rules, Whore, Wife, Women
Tags: , , , ,









The commenter known as Just Saying has posted the Red Pill Playa credo over at Sunshine Mary’s; every man that is a RPP or is aspiring to be one needs to understand it. Here it is, in its entirety:56095738_15d318e014

Just Saying
December 5, 2013 at 1:58 pm

“women do regret slutty behavior”

True, but ONLY if it is found out by others. This is why I do as well as I do – the women know that I’m not talking. So it’s “cost-free” sex, and every woman wants to up their experience without having any repercussions. That is why I thank Feminism – I really don’t have to do anything other than be myself, and provide young women with the opportunity – since they all think they are missing something. So as long as they know that a photo of them won’t be sent around, or their name won’t be circulated, they are more than willing to do whatever you want. Sure she’ll regret it if anyone were to ever find out, but as long as no one does – it didn’t happen in her mind.

Look at all of the women that scream “rape” after willingly having sex – the video of the woman getting oral sex when waiting in line, comes to mind. Yeah – she said it was rape when the video shows she was pulling his head between her legs and moaning. So she was trying to excuse her slutty behavior. That is how women think – they WANT to be sluts, they just don’t want men, or other women, to KNOW they are sluts. So if she feels safe, and that no one will ever know the things she’s done – she’ll do things she wouldn’t have dreamed of doing any other way. All of her sick fantasies – to be tied up, beaten, choked, kidnapped, “raped”, etc.. Most women have those fantasies, and they will act on them. Bless their black little hearts… (And other more colorful areas….)

Heck, I cannot count the number of times I have had unprotected sex with a woman who makes her boyfriend wear a condom. They get off on “being bad” – it turns them on to know that they are having unprotected sex with someone old enough to be their father and making their boyfriend wear a condom. She just want him as a cover for her sluttiness – so if she gets knocked up, he’ll take the blame. Women can be very dependable when you depend on them to blame others for their actions. Heck, that is what Feminism is based on – blaming others for her own choices.

Boom. You can’t get any plainer than that. I also hope this clears up the questions that keep getting asked by men that find out about their wives’ slutty past. tumblr_kqaycjo6pv1qzl3sdo1_r1_500Women do those things because that’s what they wanted to do.


Please let go of your notions of pedestalized, non-sexual, demure femininity. It is the male equivalent of chasing unicorns. Arabian_unicorns_csg010-1


I have read at least three epic threads in the last several weeks: two from Sunshine Mary:

How Feminism self-perpetuates: Today’s Sluts, Tomorrow’s Frivorcees & Spinsters

Why Do Modern Women try to use Sex to secure Commitment from Men?

And one from Haley’s Halo:

Do People Even Want to Date Anymore?

….and the comment threads all(eventually) move towards the same issues:its-not-fair1

“Why do women say they want nice guys when they really want thugs?”

“Why does the Bible say ‘flee fornication’ but that’s exactly what women use to get their men, even Christian women?”

“Why doesn’t being a nice guy work?”

“Sluts shouldn’t be able to get married, but they still do and it’s not fair!!”

I just came to the point where I don’t get why people just ignore the clear answers. These issues have been addressed over and over again in the Manosphere ad naseum. But I thought I’d put some points together all in the same space.

Red Pill Realities

Females tend to be Hypergamous; that is, they want the best male/seed possible, hypergamyas well as the best situation possible, and are always willing to trade up to get it. This is nature’s way of ensuring that the strongest seed survives. Female thinking is Solipsistic, meaning, women tend to think that only what is in their minds is real. Their reality is a movie they wrote and it’s always playing in their heads. This is nature’s way of ensuring their survival, as they are physically the weaker sex, so their thinking is rooted in self-absorption.

Males tend to be Polygamous; that is, we want to spread our seed and pollinate as many flowers as possible. This is nature’s way of ensuring that children survive to adulthood, because if a man fathers 10 children, apart from technology & medicine, he’s fortunate of 6 of them survive to adulthood. Male thinking tends to be rooted in lines, rules, maps, formulas…we can grasp the three dimensional world well. This is nature’s way, along with our stronger bodies, of ensuring that we can provide for the women we dominate and the children we spawn.

So you can already see why people act the way they do, and also why we get mad at the problems that come with the above system.

Those problems include: Females living by their vagina tingles; strong men, not ‘moral’ or ‘nice’ men, are what excite them. Nature has wired them thus, and they have no moral qualms going after and/or surrendering to the strongest of men, regardless of situations or circumstances. This is why thugs get laid, and being a ‘nice guy’ doesn’t work. This is why many women are attracted to married men, they’ve ‘proven’ they can commit. You can’t talk a woman in or out of attraction. And you can’t apply male logic, rooted in lines and rules and formulas, to women. They simply do not think that way. What has been dubbed ‘The Hamster’ in the Manosphere is the female solipsistic ability to justify and/or rationalize almost any choice and behavior. This is frustrating to many men, but it is the nature of females, because survival and reproduction and security drive them, not morals, logic, or rules. Simple as that.

Men will use their physical and economic superiority to dominate and conquer women; much to the chagrin of non-Alpha males, women like it. They crave it. But it has to be from an Alpha, because if it’s not, domination becomes rape and conquering becomes assault and pursuit becomes stalking and creepiness. This means, in the real world, that men with natural Alphaness, or those that learn game, will have access to the most females. And those females will do whatever it WOMAN_zpsdbcc65f5takes to secure relationships with these men, including porn star quality sex. If they can secure commitment, the women are happy. If they can’t, the women will keep going down the Male Attractiveness ladder, with their legs open, until they find a man that will stay. And the uncommitted men at the top just laugh and enjoy their plethora of femme-plundering choices.

By design or necessity then, this is going to exclude females that are less attractive, by weight, age, or face; this is also going to exclude males with no Alpha traits, and/or game. Both these groups of people are going to have to take what’s left. Unfortunately this is about 80% of humanity. So these are the voices of frustration, and they are a’plenty. Feminism was created to give Alphas even more choices(removing female sexual inhibition), and through shame tactics, make non-Alpha males take the leftover women, and the women that can’t compete under any other circumstances or mating system. So this means that fatties, bitches, and sluts now have more choices and chances to compete, but not for Alphas. They’re still beta choices and below. fuck-feminism_o_1558757Betas have a generally greater access to sex, but in most cases, it’s going to be fatties or sloppy Alpha seconds, dubbed ‘Carousel Riders.’ As in cock carousel.

Nothing can be done about biology. What can be done are the same things that have always been done….and that is, the application of self-investment principles.

Women that are not naturally 9s or 10s in beauty have to go to the gym, get some fashion sense, learn sexual tricks, and more than anything else, become as feminine and demure as possible, regardless of age. Male attention will increase a hundred fold with those choices.

Men that are not natural Alphas have to go to the gym, learn game, start their own business, go to the gun range, whatever it takes to man up, and get some confidence and become a leader. Female attention will increase a hundred fold with those choices.

Q: So why don’t people do it? A: I don’t really know.MatrixBluePillRedPill

It seems that many would rather bitch and moan about the unchangeable than work on that which is changeable. That attitude, however, just leads to more frustration.


So where is God in all of this? He’s in the same place He always is, watching to see what you’re going to do with what He gave you. He put the tree inside the seed, but you have to plant it, or, no trees for you. His rules regarding sexuality and marriage are quite strict. fornicateWe are caught between the tension of biological reality and spiritual responsibility; if we adhere strictly to God’s principles, because of both biological and sociological factors, we may actually decrease the chances of finding a suitable mate. If we violate God’s principles, many times, but not ALL the time, we can end up where we always wanted to be. We can also greatly crash and burn. That doesn’t seem fair, or just, but guess what? People aren’t perfect, and neither is life. It would really be nice if obedience to God was a guarantee of success as we imagine it, and disobedience brought the wrath and judgement that we often think it should. (But only when others are disobedient; when we ourselves fall short, we want His mercy, not His justice.) I’ll write a separate post for how I think faith applies, but for now, this means, in a real world sense, some virgins will die virgins, and some whoremongers will have great marriages. BUT. Sometimes virgins find each other, and it will either not fair picturework or not, and sometimes sluttish people have STDs and multiple children and spinsterhood(male version?) to live with. There is just no guarantee of outcomes; remember, some marriages end because the love of your life dies suddenly and prematurely. Where is God then? He clearly gives no guarantee of what we think is fairness in this life. Sorry folks.



Part of taking the Red Pill for me was accepting everything I just wrote. It just is the way it is. I’ve never had a problem getting women, but if I did, I would still have to realize that I can’t change one single element about life but myself. It’s pretty much that simple. The Scripture says, “He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear.” For those of you who heard this post, God bless and let’s move forward to improve ourselves. For those that still want to rail about the way life is, then have at it.

I’m trying to get better, not bitter. Keep-Moving-Forward