Archive for the ‘Hypergamy’ Category

Not a blog this time for my favorite, but a video. Manospherians are quite familiar with The Sandman. I know this was released at the end of August, but I still wanted to feature it now, because it’s so powerful. Also because #WomenAgainstFeminism is still a thing. This video really speaks for itself: Also check it out on Sandman’s MGTOW site here. I really vibe with this sentiment, as I personally tend to have a long memory. I really hope that men never forget that women’s hypergamous strategy has been laid bare by Feminism, and you will never get her best.

So why should you give her yours?


Solipsistic in HereIf you ever wanted a glimpse into the thinking of today’s woman, a glimpse into what single men have to choose from, a glimpse into what turned PUAs and MRAs into what they are, I present to you Lauren Martin, and her article from the Feminist Scriptures:

Why Women Need To Start Asking Men Out…Because Men Have No Balls

There are just too many buckets of solipsistic gold in that article to miss, but I want to highlight a few of my favorite warpings of reality from this woman.

In her introduction she describes her disappointment in today’s men, and paints a picture of unyielding strong-women-weak-menbleakness for any girl hoping to live her dream:

Ladies, it’s been said before, but I’ll say it again: They just don’t make ‘em like they used to.

There’s no door-holding, no hand-holding and definitely no free drinks. There’s no taking off hats or courting through invitations. There are no smooth moves, no jackets to dinner. There are no flowers, no tables by candlelight. But, most importantly, there are no dates.

After too many nights spent in bars and one too many phone numbers given out, you’ve probably realized the sad truth of the situation. You’re not going on any dates or being courted in any type of manner because, unfortunately, men these days are cowards.

Funny how she completely displays her lack of understanding of the male psyche. No true man is a coward. It does not, and obviously will not, occur to her that today’s woman is no prize. There’s nothing there to be won. Men aren’t afraid to pursue….it’s that the end goal simply isn’t worth any pursuit. Not beyond a pump and dump. She continues on in her solipsistic brilliance to prove why.

Well — to be fair here — not all men, but a lot of them.

We’re dealing with a new breed of men here and it’s not the kind we grew up dreaming about. It’s the want-what-I-want-but-don’t-know-how-to-get-it type; it’s the sweet and cuddly mama’s boys who grow up terrified of making the first move; it’s the guys who have so much to say but don’t know how to say it.

Not really, no. It’s the men who grew up under Title IX, men who’ve watched other men get Divorced Raped over and over again, men watching the False Rape Accusation circus, feeling the ball crushing truths of being forced to take the Red Pill, the Death of the Nice Guy, men observing the brain crunching illogical fallacy named ‘The Slutwalk‘ and men who have been Divorce_Cakes_6cruelly exposed to the true nature of women. These men do indeed know how to say what they mean….and what they mean is, “no thanks.”

Now, the unfortunate paradox for a woman is that she must be the chased and the chaser. She must be the target and the shooter. She must play coy and simultaneously pursue him.

Anyone notice the problem here? Yet again, women are left to do all the work. We’re left playing both sides of the game because they’ve simply forgotten how to play.

It stems from a number of factors, but most prominently from the fact that men don’t know what the hell they want from us. They want the virgin and the whore. The want the slut and the good girl. They want the girl who’s hard to get, but they don’t know how to get her.

Because they don’t know what they want, they end up chasing nothing. It’s the dilemma of the overcrowded buffet. There are too many options so they choose an empty plate… or something they don’t even like to begin with.SONY DSC

This leaves women making all the moves. We must tell them what they want if we’re to get anywhere close to the goals we had for ourselves. But it will never be as we fully imagined because, in our dreams, men weren’t timid or scared little boys; in our dreams, men are the ones with the balls to ask us out.

Oh, poor women. They have to be the burden bearers, the risk takers, the decisions makers, the Lions and the Lambs, because us silly men are just scared little boys. Except we aren’t. To quote Judgy Bitch:

Of the 2977 people killed on September 11th, 2001, 414 were NYC emergency personnel who responded to the attack. 341 firefighters, 60 police officers, 8 EMTs and 3 court officers.

Two of those responders were women. The other 412 were men.

Full article here.

The unflappable Ms. Martin then goes on to tell us exactly what is to blame for the current sorry state of men.

They’re scared of you

They’ll never admit it, but you scare the hell out of them. After years of social conditioning, we’ve been duped into thinking that men are the strong ones; that they are the leaders, the protectors and the fighters; that they are the ones that see what they want and go after it.

Well, TV lied to you. Men aren’t these masculine displays of strength and perseverance.

Men are shy, timid and scared sh*tless of any woman with half a brain.

That’s pretty much what it takes to believe that, half a brain. Men have more fear? Incorrect. Women have less value. But she continues.

They got it from their mamasMamasBoy2

Why are men like this? Well, for years they’ve been raised by their mamas, the women who told them they were the best thing God created on this earth. For years, they’ve been given everything on a silver platter — up until the end of college when they were picking up women who just threw up their jungle juice.

Can’t you just smell the cauldron of irony? This coming from a culture that has spent countless ergs of energy championing and supporting single motherhood in spite of the fact that there is overwhelming evidence that children of single mothers do worse in life. But there’s more.

They think there’s always someone better

In the society in which we live today, with Gigi Hadid and Miranda Kerr’s Instagrams readily accessible, women have got a lot to compete with. Fortunately, we’re competing with women these men will never have a shot with. Unfortunately, these men don’t seem to know this.

This is just pure textbook projection. Checkout Exhibit A.

They never grew up

Immature WomenIn a sad, but not all that surprising, report by Nickelodeon UK, men are 11 years behind women in maturity. While women reach maturation by 32, men aren’t fully matured until 43. While this study garnered much attention, women everywhere were less than surprised. Didn’t we already know this?

Men never grow up, hmmm? I’ll just let these gifs right here deal with that. And her conclusion is that the current low rates of marriage are again, the sole fault of males:

To add insult to the few dates you have yet to be asked on, men are also getting married less than ever before. According to a study by Pew Research Center, only 26 percent of Generation-Y is married.

Compared to the 48 percent of our parents at this age, there’s no denying that men just don’t have their sh*t together.

Right, right, because it’s clearly men that are delaying marriage these days. Oh wait.

But the pièce de résistance of this whole piece? The fact that Ms. Martin has failed at everything she’s touched:


Lauren “LMoney” Martin grew up with one goal: to be the first woman engineer. Upon finding out there already were women engineers, and unable to pass Calc 1, she chose to study the beautiful and honorable art of advertising. After advertising proved uninspiring, she attempted a career in acting which was over before she could get on stage. And when she failed at everything else she decided to become a writer.

Yes, those lousy men. Too bad they just can’t get their crap together. Even though she has money in her nickname, and she can’t seem to generate any of her own. Even though, as Rollo tweeted today, all the richest women in the world got their wealth from men. That’s right, the Strong and Independent Woman makes money the old fashioned way….she marries into it. Or divorces into it. Or just inherits it. No work involved but the paperwork when you have a vagina.

If women are still wondering why they can’t get married, they should take a good look at Ms. Martin’s expressed thoughts. Men have to pay even if there’s just an engagement, and this is what’s waiting for you, you lucky man! I can’t understand why today’s man would be eschewing marriage, when even so-called Christian woman are rewriting the Bible to make sluthood a virtuous and holy thing. All men today have to look forward to is a washed up carousel rider who’s counting on your income, present and future, to support her while she blames you for every ill in the world. No virtue, no focus on family, delaying marriage, delaying motherhood, hateful attitudes towards men and a totally hostile court system to enforce her every accusation against you with no proof necessary other than her word.

You’ve come a long way, baby.Strong IND 3Strong IND 2

Strong IND

God Loves SlutsHas to be this one(Dalrock did a post on it, and I commented extensively there, but I thought I’d add my two cents in a post of my own), where losing virginity outside of marriage is now a new way to experience God’s love:

What is just astounding in that entire post is the language, and the Female Hamster in Turbo Overdrive. There should no longer be any doubt among Manospherians that females have the ability to rationalize anything, ANYTHING, and justify their behavior by their emotions. HAMSTERAnd have no qualms in twisting, warping, or downright ignoring clear scripture to do so. There is no upper limit to the Hypergamy Hamster.




Let’s look at some passages that she wrote, verbatim, altering them only to seem as if a man had written them:

When I started dating my then-girlfriend, a lapsed Catholic, I hadn’t been to church in over a year, though I still made an effort to pray and study the Bible. My new job was at a church ministry where I disagreed with the leadership’s theology. Proponents of the purity movement would say that I was falling away from the faith and that’s why I started fooling around with women. I no longer had a deep connection with Christ that I was supposed to have, which made me vulnerable to the manipulations of The World.

But this wasn’t my case at all, and the flattening of such a narrative does a disservice to the complexity of faith. Losing my virginity wasn’t the end result of falling away from my faith – it was the beginning of a renewal, of learning to love God and my neighbors more deeply and fully than ever before.

HAH. Can you see a guy justifying his promiscuity in this way and still punching his Christian Card? There’s more:

This also isn’t a conversion story of how losing my virginity made me realize how far away I’d fallen and now I’m chastened, back on the straight-and-narrow and celibate. I’m not celibate and I’m dating around. And I’m a Christian whose faith, at this point, is probably stronger than at any point in my younger years. And I know that this faith, this commitment, wouldn’t have been possible had I not actively made the decision to give up on purity.

Purity, for me and for many men, became a distraction from the Gospel. In evangelicalism, purity is so closely tied to a salvation message that loss of purity is necessarily painted as a loss of faith – and this leaves many men wondering what happens if they do make the decision to have sex, even if it’s in the “right” circumstances. Learning to have sex without shame often creates a crisis of faith because we’re told for years and years that sex is shameful, scary and not something men should want.

HAHAHAH! Keeping it in mah pants was a distraction from the Gospel, so gettin’ my rocks off and forgetting about that whole ‘no fornication’ thing sure did increase mah faith! But here’s the cherry(HUGE punnage intended) on top of it all:

For me, making the decision to have sex without shame, to own that part of myself and to make those decisions, has only improved my faith and my understanding of God’s love. Sex liberated me from my puritanical judgment and strict ideas about what’s right and wrong. It taught me to meet people where they are – just as Jesus did – and in that way, it became a different kind of sacrament. I judge people less now. I don’t wrap my faith up in whether or not I’m performing the rules in the right way. And I understand God’s love for God’s people on a deeper, more personal level than ever before.

Losing my virginity outside of a marriage relationship taught me how to be a better person and a better Christian. It challenged my presuppositions about what sexual health looks like, and brought into stark relief the gaps in my education about ethics and holiness. Sex, in this way, can be a sacrament, a movement toward understanding God, a form of holiness experienced in a deep, mystical way. Sex can be holy, whether or not you have a ring on your finger.


Lot. About to make some BABIES!

Lot. About to make some BABIES!

I don’t understand. Why can’t men make this same argument?

I’ll ask it again…..why isn’t this a beautiful, deeply spiritual, Gospel-enhancing experience if men do it? If Jesus made love to Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary Salome, Martha(Lazarus’ brother) and all the other women that followed Him, He’s still just as much the Savior, right? Sluts say Yes

More proof that Red Pill Truths are indeed accurate, Ravens running back Ray Rice is planning to address the media at 3 p.m. Friday for the first time since he was charged with knockingI give you exhibit 238392232nthX1239 to the umpteenth power, Janay Rice:

janay rice

flushingSo, Manosphere articles, posts, blogs, and books can pretty much be summed up as always falling into one of three categories:

1) Female Hypergamy

2) The Male Need for Game

3) Watching 1) and 2) play out in real life

But I’m here to restate this question: How does it all end? Or, more accurately, what is the next Big Thing in male/female relations?

We’ve examined, over and over again, the actual and accurate basics of the Female Imperative. We’ve debunked, time and time again, the false claims of Feminism. More and more men are awakening to the Blue Bill Betaness inside of them, and realizing what their prospects are without nutting/Gaming up. More men are adopting some level of MGTOW, after seeing the awful deal that is Marriage 2.0. That’s not what I’m talking about right now. What I’m talking about now is, what will the next huge cultural shift be? What’s the future that results from all of this going to look like?

Will it be filled with frustrated Betas that finally decide to become MGTOW? Will there simply be less males in the world in NGWOTgeneral? Will the U.S. regress to an earlier time, like the return of Finishing School for women and male chivalry, or go extreme hardcore women-are-property like many countries in the Middle East? Or will enough men with enough power realize that shipping in beautiful wife trained women from other countries will shine an even greater light on how worthless the 21st century American female is? Or will we just go straight on Logan’s Run and say that nobody gets to live past the age of 30?

There aren’t really any stats that I’m aware of that track the number of married Beta men, as being a “Beta Man” isn’t an easily measurable demographic. So let’s look at this article from last year to examine the number of weddings in total:

From 2007 to 2009, the number of marriages each year fell from 2.197 million to 2.080 million. The report estimates that more than 175,000 weddings have been postponed or foregone since the recession began.

Sociologist and demographer Wendy Manning, co-director of the National Center for Family & Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University in Bowling Green, Ohio, says the projected wedding increases “might be overly optimistic.”

“They seem to think the number of weddings is going to increase. That’s possible,” she says. But “not all those marriages are going to be among those young people entering into their first marriages. The report is focusing on the Echo Baby Boomers entering into their marrying years, which is true, but my issue is that one-third of marriages are remarriages, and the remarriages are not among the young people.”

A report based on 2010 data issued by her center last year found that 31% of all people who married that year were remarrying.

The new forecast predicts the marriage rate to remain at the record low of 6.8 marriages per 1,000 population for 2013 (where it’s been since 2009) and notes that the rate was 7.3 in 2007, just before the downturn. In addition, the report predicts that when these couples take their first vows, they’ll probably be older than brides and grooms in the past. By 2015, the company predicts, the average age at first marriage will rise to 29.2 for men and 27.1 for women, up from 28.2 for men and 26.1 for women in 2010.


6.8 marriages per 1,000 people, with most of the remarriages being among the young, with everybody pushing 30 before getting married, with same sex marriages stats not even being fully tabulated yet. And now, the number of divorces:

Marriage and Divorce

Data are for the U.S.

  • Number of marriages: 2,118,000
  • Marriage rate: 6.8 per 1,000 total population
  • Divorce rate: 3.6 per 1,000 population (44 reporting States and D.C.

That’s an astonishingly low number of people even braving the waters of marriage, with over half of them wanting out, with women initiating said outness 60-70% of the time:

So if we’re assuming a 5% Alpha Rate, that means that 2 million or so of these marriages(when factoring in Gammas and Deltas) are Beta Marriages. Everyone keeps claiming that the current climate is unsustainable, for genetic, social, and economic reasons(and yes I know those stats are not broken down by age or ethnic group). They say that neither Beta Men nor the State are going to be willing to keep furnishing women with all the rights, all the property, all the education, full control over the children, and all of the income forever, 042014_marrying_807with men paying the bill either through taxes, alimony, or child support.

So what’s the next step?

Every state rushing to legalize prostitution? Doubtful, but if you want to read an experienced perspective on that, check out The Honest Courtesan.

My personal feeling is that Polygamy will begin to surge in the U.S.; with women experiencing less and less available men, they will be more honest about their desire to share an Alpha Male than be stuck somewhere with a schlubbing Beta.

There also might be room for Marriage 3.0….something that on the surface seems more equitable for men, but again, it will be aimed primarily at the Beta Men still wanting to marry.

So what do Manospherians think? What will the next big Cultural Shift be?next-big-thing-ahead


Unicorn-Dimensions-unicorns-17788267-1024-768Right here:

Now obviously that post was not written this week, but I just found it. And it is so spot on it needs to be set to music. Some of my favorite quotes:

Most women deserve to be old and alone because since they’ve been given all the freedoms in the world to do whatever they like, they’ve not used that power to become people who are remotely desirable, likeable or respectable to men as a collective (without holding them at politically correct gunpoint) or even themselves. 

 Most women are great to childrenit’s a damn shame they can’t treat men with that same love and sacrifice – with the exception of unicorns, which most of you think you have met, but haven’t.

The skeptical and new initiates who can’t see this and question it’s truth are not deep enough down the rabbit hole, you’ve still got a long way to go – a lot of you think you can use red pill philosophy to make yourself desirable to a woman and then go fuckoff to your masturbatory Disney fantasy “…and they lived happily ever after” because now you have the magical instructions to create attraction. Bullshit. That is nothing but you still being ignorantstill being unable to accept that women are unilaterally: self-obsessed, selfish, solipsistic users.

Women only team up with you on the conditions that you’re better than them and that they can use your betterment to better themselves, as soon as you’re worse than them, they’re dumping your ass. It’s a battle. She’d use your corpse to save her own neck because she thinks she’s more important than you are. That’s reality.

Go read the whole thing. If what’s stated in that post isn’t enough to make you wake up, then, you deserve those lifetime alimony payments.wake-up

Cersei-cersei-lannister-31147140-1279-691“When you play the Game of Thrones…you win. Or you die. There is no middle ground.” ~Cersei Lannister

Know what needs to happen, stat? Men need to accept the above axiom as the bottom line for relationships with females. The Female Imperative(seek the strongest seed, ignore all but the top prospects, secure the highest amount of status & resources possible while giving away as little sex as possible, and at any sign of weakness? Seek a new target, lather, rinse, repeat) is completely incompatible with the Male Imperative(spread your seed into as many virginal young fertile prime wombs as possible, and lockdown said womb to ensure purity and paternity of seed so there is no wasted investment of resources or skewed legacy). Let’s let Cersei herself tell her story:

Did you catch all that? Cersei was having the happiest day of her life, as she believed she had scored the Alphaiest of Alphas…King Robert Baratheon himself. Yet when she discovered he was weak in bed, and his drunken heart still belonged to his dead wife, she immediately, and without hesitation, cuckolded him. With her brother. Ensuring that every heir to the Baratheon throne would be an incest born, illegitimate abomination. And she’s proud of that decision.

Serial monogamy and never ending polygamy don’t live on the same street. Your life as a man is either going to be living your dream, or living her dream. Your dream can only be achieved through Game and continually elevating status, even if you want access to just one womb. If that womb is wrapped in the youngest and the prettiest flesh possible, you have no chance for impregnation without swagger and bling. And you will soon discover that you have to plate spin even if you have only one plate.

ball-and-chain-cake-topper01If, however, you do as most men and get chumped into living her dream, you are going to spend your life giving her every resource that you have: time, attention, money, energy, regardless of how much sex or respect you get in return. She’ll either Girl Game it out of you or legally enforce it out of you, or both. You might negotiate a Hall Pass, but only the highest status men can do that; if you’re Bill Gates, your wife is not about to give up that lifestyle just because you got some side poontang. It’s also why Hillary stayed married to Bill. She’d have never gotten as far career wise as a divorced woman, as an ex-first lady. Would not have happened. If you’re a janitor, however, better call your lawyer. It’s a slow death for most men, as they have to find a way to suppress their natural desire for polygamy for 40 years; God help you if you are a Christian man, because nowadays your wife and the Pastoral mangina you serve under even count masturbation as cheating. Do you get that? You signed up to have only one legitimate source of sex for the rest of your life, and you have to continue to Game it to keep it active. If not, it will get old, fat, bitchy, take all that you have, including your offspring, and leave you to rot with no remorse whatsoever. And she just might do that anyway, especially if a better alternative presents itself and you have been slumming into BetaLand just a leeetle too long.

Lord Baelish, Lord Varys, the Tyrells, and the Lannisters, they never rest. Petyr-baelish-1024They sleep with one eye open. They have spies. Their walls have ears. Know why? Because they understand that the tide can turn at any minute; all it takes is one decision. And the most Blue Pillingest of all families, the Starks? Those that put duty starkand honor and love above all else? They keep dying. Slaughtered. Because they don’t understand what game they’re playing. Men have not yet accepted that women don’t care about you beyond your usefulness to them. This is why initial Red Pill shock is so intense; because most men have no idea how easily their woman can replace them with another workhorse.

The big raging debate around the ‘Sphere these days is whether or not Game is compatible with Scripture and Christian values; my contention is that that is the wrong question. And that’s because it’s partly rooted in the fallacy that there’s a difference between Christian women and non-Christian women. Whether a woman is a believer in, and a follower of Christ or not is irrelevant to how and why she responds to you. That’s what people seem to keep getting confused about. The women will keep trying to insist that they are submissive because that’s what God tells them to do. Wrong again. Because they are not submissive to Beta men. Only Alphas; the dominant, the strong, the fun, the confident….The Gamers. Do we understand yet that the only way to ensure that a young lass will keep her purity is to basically lock her down, surrounded by a constant guard of father and brothers? She is driven to find the worst thug, criminal, or player possible to deflower her, and there is no way for her to avoid that path besides isolation. The only difference among women is NOT whether or not they have that drive….only whether or not they will submit to that protection. Otherwise it’s over, those legs will open like a Wal-Mart on Black Friday. But for some reason, Christian men seem to completely ignore the following verse:

I Peter 3:7 – Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered.

Did you get that?? ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE. Knowledge about how women work. And because she is weaker than you. Your strength, your knowledge, your confidence, your leadership, your dominance. These are the qualities that lead to tingles, and tingles are what lead to submission. She’s not gonna read the Bible and get wet over you. She’s gonna respond to how you treat her. Just like God said she would.SUBMIT

Ephesians 5:25-27 – Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; that he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, that he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.

There it is again….she only gets wrinkle and blemish free because of what you say to her.

And you think that God doesn’t use Game? Guess again:

Deuteronomy 32:21 – They have moved me to jealousy with that which is not God; they have provoked me to anger with their vanities: and I will move them to jealousy with those which are not a people; I will provoke them to anger with a foolish nation. 

Matthew 21:43Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
Provocation to jealousy and anger with the threat of a new lover, and a threat of removal of resources….any of that sound familiar?
So once and for all men, stop thinking that Game is a contradiction of your faith or vice versa. You will scream, “BUT THEY USE GAME FOR FORNICATION!!!” Guess what? You have to use Game to attract a potential bride and Game to keep her. If you don’t have any Game skills I hope you can get used to loving your hand; that’s the only thing in your life that’ll be singing Here Comes the Bride. So I don’t care if you’re living holier than a cargo ship full of Swiss cheese, women are only going to respond to you the way you want them to, whether girlfriend, fiance, or wife, because of Game.
And if you don’t understand or accept that, you will die a slow death.DIE SLOW

203387_1I’m not raising the question because I’ve formulated a solid answer yet. I’m raising the question because in considering the variables I earnestly began to wonder about it. Let’s examine what women like:

1) Tingles – This comes from finding a man that’s confidant, dominant, and rebellious….the Alpha traits of not caring what society’s rules and expectations are, but going his own way(Ironic, isn’t it?). A man that’s not afraid to take what he wants, a man that would never make his woman his mission or his life, a man that doesn’t take her crap(which is the biggest A on the shit test scale that you can get). Preferably taller, obviously stronger, and everything else after that(bald/hair, tattoos, clear skin, etc.) is a matter of her personal taste. When females are young, extra tingles for banging a man that their father would hate. Notice also that it’s not sex in general that women crave; it’s sex with particular men that they want.

2) Status – Women love a man with status, and it’s always relative. They love a man at the top of his high profile game; athletes, clergyman, politicians, musicians. Women want to know who the most powerful man in the room is; the man that can command all the attention of the other men; they want that guy’s attention. You’re hot when you’re the Mayor of a city; but when the Governor of the State walks in, your wife will get flushed with lust. Whether she acts on it or not, her mind immediately races to “what would it be like to be with him?”

Women also crave the status of being Mrs. Somebody. Being taken. Being in a relationship. A wedding to a woman not only gives her all the focus & attention(ding!) and makes her the prettiest woman in the room(ding ding!), but also is a day where a man stands up before God, clergy, family and friends and says to the world, “I want her. I choose her. I take her.” So females, if they bottom line themselves, want the status of not being alone(which they call “settling” when they are Post Wall), but they always want the highest status man to be attached to that they can get. The higher the status of the male, the higher her tingles.

This is also the fundamental difference between a girl and a woman. A girl can be satisfied, at least at first, with 1) and 2). But a woman, especially one that has or wants children knows that she needs:

3) Resources – Financial security. Provision for herself, her lifestyle, protection for when she’s pregnant and ensuring that there’s nothing to worry about once the children come. A fine home/mansion/roof over their heads, plenty of clothes, shoes, food, and whatever else her heart desires. Women in the last 45 years have made a fuss about female economic empowerment, but you need to check out Judgy Bitch’s post here on what the numbers actually look like in terms of the workforce. Sisters claim that they’re “doing it for themselves,” but they ALWAYS want your resources if you’re a man, regardless of how much of their own they have.

So the question becomes….if a woman gets married, what incentives would she have to stay married? gold-diggers-funny-women-pictures

Incentive 1: Tingles – This only happens if she landed an Alpha in the first place. What women have a hard time accepting is that true Alpha men? Have harems. She will always be one woman among several if she somehow gets an Alpha to marry her. Many women try to change that, and the men just laugh at them, because women are incapable of processing the fact that just as hypergamy is natural to them, polygamy is natural to men. Women want the highest status man possible, men want as many of the youngest & prettiest females to impregnate as possible. Simple. But good luck getting some females to “just get it.” Others of course do, and agree to soft harems, unspoken harems, open marriages, plural marriages, or swinging. Many women don’t care if their husbands screw around, because women place little value on physical intimacy(note to men: THIS IS A HINT).

The problem comes in when we face the fact that there just aren’t enough true Alpha men to go around….which yields the ugly truth that many women marry men that they have little to no attraction to. Remember: there is no premium on physical intimacy in the female value scale. This is why, when we see the stat of 70% of divorces initiated by women; we can easily conclude that women that have Alphas and jettison them are still young enough to get another one. Most women that stay with Alphas are past their prime anyway, and know they have little chance of doing better. So, older women(35+) with Alphas are the most likely to stay married to them.

Incentive 2: Status – This is the Hillary Clinton thing. She’s always known that she could accomplish more in life and politics if she stayed Mrs. Bill Clinton than anything else. People wouldn’t even refer to her as anything else but “the former Mrs. Clinton” if she had left him. As I said here however, if a man takes a turn for the worse and his status decreases, or leaves altogether? His wife will be gone within three to six months. As men learn the hard way, a man with no status is like a woman with no beauty; people just aren’t interested. If you are a man of low status, you can rest assured that your wife feels like she settled for you, and you weren’t even her third or fourth choice. For whatever reason, she couldn’t do any better, and she’s going to convey the seething contempt and disdain she has for that fact on to you, every single day of the relationship, unless and until you become more important in her eyes. Deti’s long running acclaim that attraction cannot be generated from nothing is apropos here. Because I say, just as a man’s sense of love is inextricably tied into the physical, a woman’s love is inextricably tied into status.

Incentive 3: Resources – This is the big kahuna. how-do-you-know-if-she-s-a-gold-digger-95594067-oct-5-2012-1-600x400The State has now guaranteed that a woman has legal access to your resources regardless of any circumstance. She can literally strip you of everything that you have, and make you pay for a family you no longer get any direct benefits from. This is also always a woman’s biggest long term concern in a marriage; it doesn’t matter how the relationship starts, this will be the central issue between you. So if she was never sexually attracted to you to begin with, or she lost attraction because you either became too Beta or lost your job status, or God help you, both, she can still have the State sanctioned legally enforced financial security that she needs. Alphas that stay Alphas have no problem, but there’s only a few DiCaprios and Clooneys in the world. She will never care that much about sex, and will never have any problem getting it. But she no longer needs a man to do anything but impregnate her. Women feel that the kids are theirs, and that mothering is all a child needs, fathering is optional, and most men find out the hard way that she doesn’t want you, she wants your resources.


So I’ll ask the question again: Why Would a Woman Stay Married?

the_woman_in_the_red_dress___fiona__101570239Expounding on something I said here, we need to understand that all women are Red Pill women.

If you’re a man, the fact that 90% of what comes out of her mouth is a sh*t test is not news to her…it’s just news to you. The fact that she longs to be desired, have resources, and be controlled is not news to her…it’s news to you. The fact that she’s been dreaming, since she was a little girl, about having a Fifty Shades of Grey experience, and the fact that if she does have one, it marks her for life, is most definitely not news to her….it’s just news to you.

The fact that she will trade up in a heartbeat, and cannot stand to live on this planet in peace if she knows that another woman has more than her is not news to her…it’s just news to you. That she has not one drop of apologetic blood in her body for her natural hypergamic and solipsistic ways is not news to her…it’s just news to you.

Feminism, in all its forms, has ever been, and shall only ever be, one gigantic national sh*t test. Women smirking in men’s collective faces saying, “How far are you going to let us push this?” Letting women have their way has never resulted in them being happy in the long term, nor has it ever, EVER, made them respect men more.

She longs to be Gamed by men that “just get it” and will quickly reject and lose interest in any that don’t. She feeds on drama, chase, and challenge, and has the natural counter-intuitive tendency to want to lock down and possess that which has possessed her…and as soon as she does, she’s bored. And will always blame you for the state of the relationship, no matter what.

Don’t miss any of what was just said. She wants you to Game her. She craves men that know Game. It’s the chase that feeds her, and the worthy confident man that knows how to take what he wants that fires up the heat in her Southland regions. Thugs and criminals embody this spirit, as they have no regard for rules; this is why women surrender so easily to them. That characteristic is irresistible to the female mind.

Close up of angry man with steam coming out from his earsSo why are so many men shocked by all this?

1) Because your father never told you the truth. It’s your dad’s job to make you game aware as a young lad…and then you would’ve been ready. Instead of whining, “WAA WAA! I’M A NICE GUY AND NO GIRLS WANT ME!” you would’ve known to nut up, and learned how to dominate and conquer. The panties will be flying in your direction if you do that.

2) Too much male guilt. It’s a man’s world, and whether you believe in God or not, men are designed to be the movers and shakers. Very few women actually pioneer anything. They just get credit for being the first woman to do something that a man did years before. But Feminism keyed in on a natural strength of the female….her ability to make the male feel guilty about the way the world is, as if men designed women.

We didn’t.

3) Letting this Foolishness become Law. Everything’s unfair, the act of sex itself is penetrative so it must be rape, and men have to pay for women regardless of what they do or how much economic freedom that they gain on their own. These ridiculous ideas are now the law of the land as well as mainstream talking points, and men just let it happen.

That ought to tell you what the solution is.

beatsnotbuyingitSo what about women that claim they’ve “taken the Red Pill?”

Do you know what women mean when they say that? It means that they are willing to acknowledge, out loud, what they’ve always known in their hearts to be true. And normally, they only do so either after they’ve secured their own Alpha, or accepted their own spinsterhood. It’s amazing what either security or harsh reality does to a woman. For women to actually be free of their Female Matrix, built by Feminism and YouGoGrrl Culture, they have to take the Pink Pill.

So my challenge to the men is always the same….can’t you see that being Blue Pill is an abomination? An aberration? A delusional state? wide-_1378251719-620x349A tucking of your nuts back up into your sack? And for what, exactly? IT DOESN’T BRING YOU SUCCESS. *facepalm* Part of being a man means that you are constructed to dominate, conquer, lead, teach, provide for, and protect a woman(most of the time from her own foolishness). Women that fight you and say that’s sexist? They then do their best to become men themselves. What does that tell you?

So let today be the last day of Blue Pillage for all men that are reading this but are still plugged in. Don’t be afraid to develop what is naturally yours. If we all united as men, you realize that we could have the laws changed in less than six months, right?

Time to nut up.

In Reply to Nicole

Posted: December 27, 2013 in Hypergamy, Life, Wife, Women
Tags: , ,

My comments at CH keep disappearing. So over on this thread, The Ten Year Cuck, I told this story:

My best friend became friends with a girl in college. He went back very late, he was 32 at the time, she was 18. A lot of guys wanted her; my friend didn’t, but they became close friends. All of them supposed Christians.
She married the worst guy possible; no job, no money, would monopolize the computer playing poker instead of letting his kids use it. They had two kids, they fist fought, he cheated, they eventually broke up, he left her with a house in foreclosure and several thousand dollars worth of credit card debt. All this time she had been setting up my friend as a Plan B.
She hooks up with my friend before the divorce ink is even dry; it’s not CLOSE to final and she’s sleeping with him, taking road trips, saying that he’s “the love of her life,: and “she’s never loved anyone the way she loves him,” and “she’d even be willing to give her life for him.” They date for about a year & half, and she starts putting the marriage squeeze on. My friend says no, heartbroken. He loved her, but he was not cleaning up her mess and marrying her.
She married her next door neighbor less than a year later; a man she’d met while she was dating my friend. She’d known my friend for 13 years; she’d known her now husband for less than six months.

This shit is real.

What’s not typical is finding a woman that actually cares about the man she’s with. Men are just a means to an end for women. And yes, AWALT.

Nicole replied thusly:

If you have an argument with this, take it up with Nature.

It’s not that we can’t genuinely love a man. It’s that, especially in the recent pussified generations, most of you have nothing real to offer a woman but children and money. Get rid of the overly romantic notions, and you become lovable to women.

A man who understands the difference between men and women conducts himself in a way that shows that he understands, so he gets quality women, how ever he judges that. Equalists behave like women are or should be men, and this turns off quality women by almost any definition, and only attracts harpies looking for an emotional punching bag. They may get settled for as an expedient last resort, but if you haven’t established dominance, don’t expect love.

It is important that you understand that (sane) women’s job is to control access and resist unless or until we find a suitable mate. Our psychology will use whatever means necessary to convince us to go for resources/status first, because this ensures the security of our offspring. Love doesn’t pay the bills.

Women sport-shagging is very recent, and I believe it will go out of style simply for practical reasons. Women just aren’t built for this, and we’re not even getting love for it. Fun neither pays the bills nor brings any emotional fulfillment.

Romantic love is a luxury that most women in the world can’t afford, even if we are capable of feeling it sometimes. Even then, the basis of it for the godliest good girl you will ever meet is the same as it is for the wickedest whore: admiration and respect.

Tell me what there is to admire in the cute guy behind the counter at the juice bar who thinks I’m his equal.

….now tell me what there is to admire in the not so cute but wealthy owner of that juice bar who thinks I’m his equal.

Of both ladyboys, which should a woman choose?

This is the choice women are being asked to make nowadays. If everybody’s either a faggot or shiftless, which Gay or stupid guy would be wisest for me to make babies with?

 My response to that is the following:

It’s not that we can’t genuinely love a woman. It’s that, especially in the recent bitchified generations, most of you have nothing real to offer a man but a good pump & dump. Get rid of the overly egalitarian notions, and you become lovable to men.

A woman who understands the difference between men and women conducts herself in a way that shows that she understands, so she gets quality men, however she judges that. Equalists behave like men are or should be women, and this turns off quality men by almost any definition, and only attracts manginas looking for a mom. They may get settled for as an expedient last resort for sex, but if you haven’t displayed submission, don’t expect love.

It is important that you understand that (sane) men’s job is to spread seed for bequeathing an estate and ensuring generational survival into non-slutty women to avoid being a cuck. Our psychology will use whatever means necessary to convince us to go for submissive, beautiful, virginal or low N count women still in their prime to marry, because this ensures the paternity of our offspring & the chances of them being raised well. Bitches just create bills.

Men being publicly shamed for extra-marital sport-shagging is very recent, and I believe it will go out of style simply for practical reasons. Men are just built for this, and we understand that it doesn’t mean you don’t love your wife. Fun shouldn’t cost a man his entire livelihood & reputation.

Lifetime monogamy is a lie that most men in the world can’t afford to buy into, because they don’t understand the predatory nature of females, and because she’s only got 15 years of being in her prime. The basis of a man’s love for the godliest good man you will ever meet is the same as it is for the wickedest cad: youth and beauty. Nobody writes music about 40+ year old women.

Tell me what there is to admire in the slutty blonde behind the counter at the juice bar who thinks she’s my equal but still wants to drain all of my resources for a body she’s been handing out for free since she was 13 years old?

….now tell me what there is to admire in the overly masculine Oprahfied bitch who owns that juice bar because she frivorced it from her first husband and claims shes “strong and independent.”

Of both entitled harpies, which should a man choose?

This is the choice men are being asked to make nowadays. If everybody’s either a raging slut or an overweight ugly masculine bitch, which shrew or stupid whore would be wisest for me to make any kind of commitment to?

If you have an argument with this, take it up with Nature.

God bless America.